Why is your question general or specific? When should the definite article be used? No?
How do I know ‘The’ is the definite article, which is used in front of a noun when a specific thing or group of things is referred to as opposed to making general statements.
How can I clear out a confusion about how I am
- going to destroy people who interfere with my plans?
Was the above sentence needed for the definite article or are all the sentences generic?
If a sentence uses the exact same construction
- : I won’t destroy those who interfered with my plans!
There were people who interfered, but the speaker, though angry and frustrated, wants revenge on those people.It would make perfect sense why the definite Article is required, as the readers would understand from it that there were people who interfered, and the speaker, if his anger in particular happened, wants to get revenge on those people.Who wants to intervene?
But, in sentence number 1, the speaker didn’t refer to people in general (everyone) but “people that interfere” (specific)(personal), to the Speaker who said the same thing before, in part 10, sentence 1, statement 1, sentence 2, sentence 3, sentence 2, sentence 2 sentence 4). As an audience the speaker can’t predict who will walk on his plan, nor does the listener who actually listens. How does sentence 1 sounds without the definite article?
I like people that are confident. Thanks.
I like girls which are confident. This sounds very much correct and much better than ‘I want that.’ Is ‘people that are confident’ in themselves or is it something other than what they think? What is the logic behind the above question? Where by relative clause are nouns defined in a name? Is the noun definite?
I really
need some extra words, thanks.
I will destroy people who interfere with my plans. I want to destroy all of them! What will you do? ” You are making a general statement about the future.
What’s the point of saying “I will destroy any people who interfere with my plans!”? That is it ” All about the future and destruction in the future”. Who are some of the potential characters in the movie that are fictional: they’re all hypothetical. The effective meaning is the same as in the first example.
I will destroy the people who interfered with my plans. ” then the destruction is in the future and the interference is now in the past. That means that you’re no longer talking about a hypothetical group of people: some specific people have done the interference, and they could be identified and pointed to as being the group of people. What are the things that would actually destroy all of us in this case?
If 2 and 1 mean the same thing – is there any difference? What do you think/feel of the definite article? When I say “mean it”, it feels like my own words. Why does it make sense to believe in people who will interfere? What’s your opinion and
why?
I will destroy people who interfere with my plans. I want to destroy all of them! What will you do? ” You are making a general statement about the future.
What’s the point of saying “I will destroy any people who interfere with my plans!”? That is it ” All about the future and destruction in the future”. Who are some of the potential characters in the movie that are fictional: they’re all hypothetical. The effective meaning is the same as in the first example.
I will destroy the people who interfered with my plans. ” then the destruction is in the future and the interference is now in the past. That means that you’re no longer talking about a hypothetical group of people: some specific people have done the interference, and they could be identified and pointed to as being the group of people. What are the things that would actually destroy all of us in this case?
If 2 and 1 mean the same thing – is there any difference? What do you think/feel of the definite article? When I say “mean it”, it feels like my own words. Why does it make sense to believe in people who will interfere? What’s your opinion and
why?
I will destroy people who interfere with my plans. I want to destroy all of them! What will you do? ” You are making a general statement about the future.
What’s the point of saying “I will destroy any people who interfere with my plans!”? That is it ” All about the future and destruction in the future”. Who are some of the potential characters in the movie that are fictional: they’re all hypothetical. The effective meaning is the same as in the first example.
I will destroy the people who interfered with my plans. ” then the destruction is in the future and the interference is now in the past. That means that you’re no longer talking about a hypothetical group of people: some specific people have done the interference, and they could be identified and pointed to as being the group of people. What are the things that would actually destroy all of us in this case?
If 2 and 1 mean the same thing – is there any difference? What do you think/feel of the definite article? When I say “mean it”, it feels like my own words. Why does it make sense to believe in people who will interfere? What’s your opinion and
why?
I will destroy people who interfere with my plans. I want to destroy all of them! What will you do? ” You are making a general statement about the future.
What’s the point of saying “I will destroy any people who interfere with my plans!”? That is it ” All about the future and destruction in the future”. Who are some of the potential characters in the movie that are fictional: they’re all hypothetical. The effective meaning is the same as in the first example.
I will destroy the people who interfered with my plans. ” then the destruction is in the future and the interference is now in the past. That means that you’re no longer talking about a hypothetical group of people: some specific people have done the interference, and they could be identified and pointed to as being the group of people. What are the things that would actually destroy all of us in this case?
If 2 and 1 mean the same thing – is there any difference? What do you think/feel of the definite article? When I say “mean it”, it feels like my own words. Why does it make sense to believe in people who will interfere? What’s your opinion and
why?
I will destroy people who interfere with my plans. I want to destroy all of them! What will you do? ” You are making a general statement about the future.
What’s the point of saying “I will destroy any people who interfere with my plans!”? That is it ” All about the future and destruction in the future”. Who are some of the potential characters in the movie that are fictional: they’re all hypothetical. The effective meaning is the same as in the first example.
I will destroy the people who interfered with my plans. ” then the destruction is in the future and the interference is now in the past. That means that you’re no longer talking about a hypothetical group of people: some specific people have done the interference, and they could be identified and pointed to as being the group of people. What are the things that would actually destroy all of us in this case?
If 2 and 1 mean the same thing – is there any difference? What do you think/feel of the definite article? When I say “mean it”, it feels like my own words. Why does it make sense to believe in people who will interfere? What’s your opinion and
why?
I will destroy people who interfere with my plans. I want to destroy all of them! What will you do? ” You are making a general statement about the future.
What’s the point of saying “I will destroy any people who interfere with my plans!”? That is it ” All about the future and destruction in the future”. Who are some of the potential characters in the movie that are fictional: they’re all hypothetical. The effective meaning is the same as in the first example.
I will destroy the people who interfered with my plans. ” then the destruction is in the future and the interference is now in the past. That means that you’re no longer talking about a hypothetical group of people: some specific people have done the interference, and they could be identified and pointed to as being the group of people. What are the things that would actually destroy all of us in this case?
If 2 and 1 mean the same thing – is there any difference? What do you think/feel of the definite article? When I say “mean it”, it feels like my own words. Why does it make sense to believe in people who will interfere? What’s your opinion and
why?
I will destroy people who interfere with my plans. I want to destroy all of them! What will you do? ” You are making a general statement about the future.
What’s the point of saying “I will destroy any people who interfere with my plans!”? That is it ” All about the future and destruction in the future”. Who are some of the potential characters in the movie that are fictional: they’re all hypothetical. The effective meaning is the same as in the first example.
I will destroy the people who interfered with my plans. ” then the destruction is in the future and the interference is now in the past. That means that you’re no longer talking about a hypothetical group of people: some specific people have done the interference, and they could be identified and pointed to as being the group of people. What are the things that would actually destroy all of us in this case?
If 2 and 1 mean the same thing – is there any difference? What do you think/feel of the definite article? When I say “mean it”, it feels like my own words. Why does it make sense to believe in people who will interfere? What’s your opinion and
why?
I will destroy people who interfere with my plans. I want to destroy all of them! What will you do? ” You are making a general statement about the future.
What’s the point of saying “I will destroy any people who interfere with my plans!”? That is it ” All about the future and destruction in the future”. Who are some of the potential characters in the movie that are fictional: they’re all hypothetical. The effective meaning is the same as in the first example.
I will destroy the people who interfered with my plans. ” then the destruction is in the future and the interference is now in the past. That means that you’re no longer talking about a hypothetical group of people: some specific people have done the interference, and they could be identified and pointed to as being the group of people. What are the things that would actually destroy all of us in this case?
If 2 and 1 mean the same thing – is there any difference? What do you think/feel of the definite article? When I say “mean it”, it feels like my own words. Why does it make sense to believe in people who will interfere? What’s your opinion and
why?
I will destroy people who interfere with my plans. I want to destroy all of them! What will you do? ” You are making a general statement about the future.
What’s the point of saying “I will destroy any people who interfere with my plans!”? That is it ” All about the future and destruction in the future”. Who are some of the potential characters in the movie that are fictional: they’re all hypothetical. The effective meaning is the same as in the first example.
I will destroy the people who interfered with my plans. ” then the destruction is in the future and the interference is now in the past. That means that you’re no longer talking about a hypothetical group of people: some specific people have done the interference, and they could be identified and pointed to as being the group of people. What are the things that would actually destroy all of us in this case?
If 2 and 1 mean the same thing – is there any difference? What do you think/feel of the definite article? When I say “mean it”, it feels like my own words. Why does it make sense to believe in people who will interfere? What’s your opinion and
why?
I will destroy people who interfere with my plans. I want to destroy all of them! What will you do? ” You are making a general statement about the future.
What’s the point of saying “I will destroy any people who interfere with my plans!”? That is it ” All about the future and destruction in the future”. Who are some of the potential characters in the movie that are fictional: they’re all hypothetical. The effective meaning is the same as in the first example.
I will destroy the people who interfered with my plans. ” then the destruction is in the future and the interference is now in the past. That means that you’re no longer talking about a hypothetical group of people: some specific people have done the interference, and they could be identified and pointed to as being the group of people. What are the things that would actually destroy all of us in this case?
If 2 and 1 mean the same thing – is there any difference? What do you think/feel of the definite article? When I say “mean it”, it feels like my own words. Why does it make sense to believe in people who will interfere? What’s your opinion and
why?
