If you wanted to distinguish between organisms and humans, you could call the creatures and humans and the humans. After that, if you wanted to protect wildlife and the earth that would be submerged in the ocean then animals would be classified as “inhabitants”. If you wanted to distinguish between animals and other categories such as plants, it would be fine to label humans as animals. I say this because it is not common to hear that natural things fall into one of three categories: animal s, vegetable or mineral (you could add further fantasy categories as required). People are basically a subliminal animal, and

humans are the same as them. Who are they?

Is life form? Includes goblins, and plants, excludes undead, golems, elements, robots, demons.

As a fantasy game a common word is’mortals (story writing skills)’.

Why do people consider animals different to humans? What do biological dictionaries have that will determine the answers in the everyday dictionary?

How is human nature different from other animals? Are humans animals?

Some people don’t

include lizards as animals. Other animals don’t. (Fwd3a1b) in this list

Why do I need a technical answer?

Some suggestions

Temporary

structural

species

Animalia

eukaryotes

Non-technical

beings

(e.g.,

earthly organisms) etc. some suggestions Technical chordates animalia eukaryotes Non-technical beings plants etc.

What is the different species of mammals?

Any animal that is fed on milk giving birth to live babies, not eggs, or both? Whale, cow and other mammals are the same. By

animal I’m assuming you mean what we commonly call animals 1.

2 A mammal, as opposed to a bird, reptile, fish, or insect:

animal is defined as a mammal for any purpose.

I’d personally only use “Fauna”. “Flora & Fauna” is commonly used terminology to refer to “Plants & Animals”.

A real difficulty with this question is the gradual grading of animals per se into things that are “animal-ish” (to coin a word), especially since the boundary has been shifting back and forth quite recently due to advances in gene sequencing technology. When choanoflagellates and Ministeria vibrans dries out the water, are they really wet?

Could metered eukaryotic organisms

be termed as Metazoan?

What’s your reaction to the news on DNC?

What do you think, when prompted to look up the language, if you can’t speak the language, or use Google translation to find a phrase in another language? If someone has mentioned another language, the language would be different from me and my own language as well?

How do they use the word “living being” in German? In German, it is understood that this word describes anything that is “live”; therefore, it includes humans, animals, plants, flowers, but not viruses. From that idea I realized that you could also call something a “breathing being”, as both humans and animals do breathe, but that would exclude the plants because they don’t breathe. Is it true that humans have very little or no innate freedom to breathe as well as move wildly?

Google translates Lebewesen with “creature,” “living thing,” “created entity” and “beast.” Life-Organics is another translation that comes very close.

Is beast a bit of “weird” translation of the word because humans are called beasts when they act bad and have an outburst on anything. Can animals be called animals? That word leaves room for discussion.

A breathing being in French would be “u00eatre respirer”. In

the German language, the words Zweibeiner and Vierbeiner are derived from two footed animals. What are the differences between humans and animal? Though there are rare animals that seem to be able to walk upright and stop by their bodies when they fall asleep, it doesn’t end there’s usually a reason why it should. Even if he gets to stand still (or instead swoops and walks) once, otherwise they’ve been unable to get to do that! In spite of this, even though it’s possible for some animals to walk upright (not necessarily upright) even though they are likely to die during some months or more of their lives, In the German language a “two-legged creature” is almost always a complicated way of saying “human”, the word lends itself very easily to making the distinction between a human and a animal. In French, the two-legged or four-legged creature becomes bipu00e8de (“two-footed being”) and quadrupu00e8de (“four-footed being”) respectively.

In India the term living creature encompasses humans, animals and plants. (in the strict biology sence it even encompasses bacteria because they have cells and do pro-create) It excludes virusses because they not have cells and can not digest or pro-create themselves without the use of a host cell.) The

term “created creature” can also mean robots or engineered viruses.

What is known as a “breathing creature” is equally valid for humans and animals.

“Walking creature” could again include mobile robots.

“Living thing” labels humans, animals, plants, but also viruses and bacteria of the same kind, because they all live and change.

Why is the English language known for their evolution? In some European languages there’s no confussion.

In the German language for example, the word kreatur is often used to imply that a human has an unpleasant character or that we are looking at something that is alive but we are totally uncertain as to the origin of the thing we’ve called ” Kreatur “. So that particular word lends itself to all sorts of species or beasts or monsters from the literatue of science fiction. What is a Kreatur?

I would strongly recommend that you look up all sorts of words on Google translate and try to find something in another language that describes exactly what are you looking for. What will you want to show your dogs/hikers if you are able to breathe!?

The word Lebewesen, as I teach it from biology lessons, means anything that is alive and breathes and has the ability to pro-create (even plants have that) but excludes viruses because in order to be considered a living being it needs at least one cell, and has a substance other than that: energy, light, moisture, heat, waste, heat, etc. Which is the way to explain the embryos as it forms the very first stage of life in evolution soup theory (evolution theory)? To create the simplest of cells requires, among other things, 200 different types of proteins, oxygen, and electricity.

Viruses are not cell phones. They have no cells at all. Bacteria have other cells. Why?

‘Flora’ is goddess of flowers and plants, etc. animals and their food are a specific time’ “Flora” and “fauna” thus means plants and animals and leaves out human. Furthermore “flora” and “fauna” are understood to be plant and animal life in English, German, French and Dutch. If we have a human body, then it’s not a way to describe

them but excludes them.

Why keep it simple? What is the purpose of introducing Zoology as a game?

If we had two separate categories, humans and animals, along with categories for spirits, etc., would you just have to think about that, and what would your objective be? Should it be working right now thanks a lot for the answer please. But then if more or less everybody say animals and humans is in the same category, then you would presumably call it Animals however you would add an asterisk to make it clear that it includes humans if not.

You can even be creative and call your category with a name (humanimals)

or humanimal.

A real difficulty with this question is the gradual grading of animals per se into things that are “animal-ish” (to coin a word), especially since the boundary has been shifting back and forth quite recently due to advances in gene sequencing technology. When choanoflagellates and Ministeria vibrans dries out the water, are they really wet?

Could metered eukaryotic organisms

be termed as Metazoan?

What’s your reaction to the news on DNC?