Is it leads to or leads to? As a person, I felt confused. I know not all bloggers. But I should say that it’s all in the best of my heads, I’m really not sure to.
My speech English is a second language. When will I write my essay? What are the potential scenarios of scattering
potential? A: Different scattering potentials lead to different cross sections scaling.
2. Different scattering potentials leads to different cross sections scaling (Ig>13,24,32,24,32,30,24).
I should have learnt as to whether A or B is correct or not? What is the difference between “lead” and “lead” in this case?
I prefer personality preference B. It sounds better to me than A but when I think about grammar it may be A: have more than one potential, so it’s plural and not “He, she or it”. Please correct me and explain the thing to me. I always have problems with such constructions. What would be general explanation for this things?
If a subject is singular, you would use “lead” and “lead++” respectively. What do you think
of the road that leads to Rome? How
do these roads lead to Rome? “So
in your case, if there was one scattering potential you might say something like this: “The
scattering potential leads to…” and if
there is more than one scattering potential being discussed, you would say “Different scattering
potentials lead to…”
Why can’t you describe the difference between “different scaling of cross sections” and “different scaling of cross sections”?
What are some of your views on life in the U.S.A.?
If a subject is singular, you would use “lead” and “lead++” respectively. What do you think
of the road that leads to Rome? How
do these roads lead to Rome? “So
in your case, if there was one scattering potential you might say something like this: “The
scattering potential leads to…” and if
there is more than one scattering potential being discussed, you would say “Different scattering
potentials lead to…”
Why can’t you describe the difference between “different scaling of cross sections” and “different scaling of cross sections”?
What are some of your views on life in the U.S.A.?
Simply looking at what the subject is, “potentials lead” would have to be right. Why do students have “leads” because they are thinking of scattering as their subject subject? Do you want to say, “different scattering of potentials leads to something…”? How would we know if we have one.? I think “scattering potentials” is the subject and “lead” the predicate. Also, it seems “cross-section scaling” would be correct and would mean the same as “scaling of cross sections. If you want to end a sentence like this, will you spell the phrase “what” instead of “this thing? If not, then I think you might be suffering from a desire to use or repeat a final “s” more often than English allows.)
If a subject is singular, you would use “lead” and “lead++” respectively. What do you think
of the road that leads to Rome? How
do these roads lead to Rome? “So
in your case, if there was one scattering potential you might say something like this: “The
scattering potential leads to…” and if
there is more than one scattering potential being discussed, you would say “Different scattering
potentials lead to…”
Why can’t you describe the difference between “different scaling of cross sections” and “different scaling of cross sections”?
What are some of your views on life in the U.S.A.?
Simply looking at what the subject is, “potentials lead” would have to be right. Why do students have “leads” because they are thinking of scattering as their subject subject? Do you want to say, “different scattering of potentials leads to something…”? How would we know if we have one.? I think “scattering potentials” is the subject and “lead” the predicate. Also, it seems “cross-section scaling” would be correct and would mean the same as “scaling of cross sections. If you want to end a sentence like this, will you spell the phrase “what” instead of “this thing? If not, then I think you might be suffering from a desire to use or repeat a final “s” more often than English allows.)
If a subject is singular, you would use “lead” and “lead++” respectively. What do you think
of the road that leads to Rome? How
do these roads lead to Rome? “So
in your case, if there was one scattering potential you might say something like this: “The
scattering potential leads to…” and if
there is more than one scattering potential being discussed, you would say “Different scattering
potentials lead to…”
Why can’t you describe the difference between “different scaling of cross sections” and “different scaling of cross sections”?
What are some of your views on life in the U.S.A.?
If a subject is singular, you would use “lead” and “lead++” respectively. What do you think
of the road that leads to Rome? How
do these roads lead to Rome? “So
in your case, if there was one scattering potential you might say something like this: “The
scattering potential leads to…” and if
there is more than one scattering potential being discussed, you would say “Different scattering
potentials lead to…”
Why can’t you describe the difference between “different scaling of cross sections” and “different scaling of cross sections”?
What are some of your views on life in the U.S.A.?
Simply looking at what the subject is, “potentials lead” would have to be right. Why do students have “leads” because they are thinking of scattering as their subject subject? Do you want to say, “different scattering of potentials leads to something…”? How would we know if we have one.? I think “scattering potentials” is the subject and “lead” the predicate. Also, it seems “cross-section scaling” would be correct and would mean the same as “scaling of cross sections. If you want to end a sentence like this, will you spell the phrase “what” instead of “this thing? If not, then I think you might be suffering from a desire to use or repeat a final “s” more often than English allows.)
If a subject is singular, you would use “lead” and “lead++” respectively. What do you think
of the road that leads to Rome? How
do these roads lead to Rome? “So
in your case, if there was one scattering potential you might say something like this: “The
scattering potential leads to…” and if
there is more than one scattering potential being discussed, you would say “Different scattering
potentials lead to…”
Why can’t you describe the difference between “different scaling of cross sections” and “different scaling of cross sections”?
What are some of your views on life in the U.S.A.?
Simply looking at what the subject is, “potentials lead” would have to be right. Why do students have “leads” because they are thinking of scattering as their subject subject? Do you want to say, “different scattering of potentials leads to something…”? How would we know if we have one.? I think “scattering potentials” is the subject and “lead” the predicate. Also, it seems “cross-section scaling” would be correct and would mean the same as “scaling of cross sections. If you want to end a sentence like this, will you spell the phrase “what” instead of “this thing? If not, then I think you might be suffering from a desire to use or repeat a final “s” more often than English allows.)
