Word that describes terms that exclude or divide people or define them.
How can evolutionary
-
and creationists like evolutionism help save an endangered species of bees? The creationist remarks about how bees were ‘created’ to pollinate plants. As evolutionists, a creationist wants to work with each other. What do they agree?
-
How do I promote equality between the sexes in the workplace? At some point, the woman complains about the’manosphere’. This discourages the man from participating in the movement, feels attacked by use of that term.
-
A pro-life woman and pro-choice girl want to help single mothers. What exactly makes a single mom so evil? A woman is one of the pro-choice politicians. In her stead she opposes abortion since she already sees it as having no legal basis.
When saying divide people in quotes, what do you mean? What are the uses of these words? In each scenario, a neutral language could have been used, or the word wasn’t necessary to describe the cause.
If your examples are offensive but you don’t want to dispell them
please help me.
What “polemical” is your answer to this post? I think making a speech makes you sound smart. If you make a smart speech (or maybe pretentious), how would it go wrong depending on the audience?
plemical plemk()l/ adjective: polemical
of, relating to, or involving highly critical, controversial, or disputatious writing or speech.
Whatsapp, CATRO?
Why are abortion and evolution the most Divisive?
I think in the context you describe it would be acceptable to describe the language tied to those issues as divisive.
If you want to describe a situation where a minority group or an individual is being excluded, over the term “eclipse” you might use the word exclusionary.
I’d consider the word partisan, particularly in examples 1 and 3, where the language used is specifically designed to separate otherwise entirely compatible people on a single issue.
What kind of language should I use for this sort of situation?” “His comments put a wedge between them. “Hit
you. I can’t be there, I don’t know!’
What kind of language should I use for this sort of situation?” “His comments put a wedge between them. “Hit
you. I can’t be there, I don’t know!’
I’d call this labeling people, assigning labels
Latino High School Graduation: Defying the Odds – Page 36 Harriett D. Romo – 1996
There is a substantial literature demonstrating the simple act of labeling people significantly affects their behavior. 14 Students who are labeled ‘geated and determined’ are much more likely to behave accordingly.
What kind of language should I use for this sort of situation?” “His comments put a wedge between them. “Hit
you. I can’t be there, I don’t know!’
Weve got a big divide with schismatic. What makes schismatic?
Is there any basis for it being controversial? I think the individual words could be described more specifically as divisive. In each case, one person used divisive language which discouraged the other person from wanting to participate in the game. I would argue that the words could be considered divisive because they are often in complete contrast (to the point of being offensive) to the other person’s view.
This section is divisive and to be a dj. — Oxford
To cause conflict between people: the highly divisive issue of abortion’
Being completely dependent on the context, calling such words controversial can usually also be of help.
You generally want to go with divisive, but in the case of this word being brought up by large groups of people and/or in frequent occasion (e.g. Female empowerment (precisely controversial); more or less a strong word choice in literary terms.
We use division; should I use division to
do something?
