Why ‘keep’,’retain’ and’maintain’ for the product features?
I want to describe a new product which is an improved version of an existing one. The new product has all the features from the existing product, and adds a few new features.
I am looking for a nice way to phrase the above, specifically the verb which is used to say that the new products has all the features from the previous one:
- Product X retains all the features from product Y, and adds… Product
- X retains all the features from product Y, and adds… but lacks
- features other?
How much are the benefits of being in an association after a crash?
Product Y can keep or retain its own features, for example after some kind of upgrade, but product X cannot keep or retain the features of product Y, because they belong to product Y.
However, if product Y is considered to be an “upgrade” of product X (e.g. ntkv xbnbbcbf’s product Xbnbc’s product Y” content), y can be an “upgrade” of product X (e If my iPhone 6 is better than the iPhone 5 (I think the iPhone 6 does better), then retain would be valid.
No of the meanings of maintain are suitable either.
How can I make it simpler by just with have
: Product X has all the features of product Y and
adds everything… Note that features are properties of something, so you need to use the preposition of rather than
from.
Product Y can keep or retain its own features, for example after some kind of upgrade, but product X cannot keep or retain the features of product Y, because they belong to product Y.
However, if product Y is considered to be an “upgrade” of product X (e.g. ntkv xbnbbcbf’s product Xbnbc’s product Y” content), y can be an “upgrade” of product X (e If my iPhone 6 is better than the iPhone 5 (I think the iPhone 6 does better), then retain would be valid.
No of the meanings of maintain are suitable either.
How can I make it simpler by just with have
: Product X has all the features of product Y and
adds everything… Note that features are properties of something, so you need to use the preposition of rather than
from.
Product Y can keep or retain its own features, for example after some kind of upgrade, but product X cannot keep or retain the features of product Y, because they belong to product Y.
However, if product Y is considered to be an “upgrade” of product X (e.g. ntkv xbnbbcbf’s product Xbnbc’s product Y” content), y can be an “upgrade” of product X (e If my iPhone 6 is better than the iPhone 5 (I think the iPhone 6 does better), then retain would be valid.
No of the meanings of maintain are suitable either.
How can I make it simpler by just with have
: Product X has all the features of product Y and
adds everything… Note that features are properties of something, so you need to use the preposition of rather than
from.
Product Y can keep or retain its own features, for example after some kind of upgrade, but product X cannot keep or retain the features of product Y, because they belong to product Y.
However, if product Y is considered to be an “upgrade” of product X (e.g. ntkv xbnbbcbf’s product Xbnbc’s product Y” content), y can be an “upgrade” of product X (e If my iPhone 6 is better than the iPhone 5 (I think the iPhone 6 does better), then retain would be valid.
No of the meanings of maintain are suitable either.
How can I make it simpler by just with have
: Product X has all the features of product Y and
adds everything… Note that features are properties of something, so you need to use the preposition of rather than
from.
