Why is the INVERTIVE structure (against the obverse structure) correct?
Various statistics surrounding the percentage of graduates working in different sectors of industries in Britain in 2004 at a GATE level compared to an average of 0.5% in 1990 (and from 1991 to 1999)
Is this sentence grammatically correct? And why? The part of the sentence that I am concerning is “Given as is the chart concerning…”. This structural component is an inversion structure. Is there any knowledge about this construction? I have searched and tried to learn about it but I couldn’t find this structure on Google (though there are many other inversion structures such as with adverbs: rarely, rarely, not until, only when…”you name it).
My English teacher showed me this structure which is used to write a report in the IELST test, but I still highly doubt that, since he is not a native.
What is your review of the sentence “The Black Hoggle”?
What is the best way to get the right idea based on your experience?
Why do we have this word order for something that is “given”, “attached”, etc.? is typical in some other languages, but somewhat awkward in English.
See this discussion about using “attached is”. And here is a German example of ‘given’ at the beginning of a sentence.
What is your take on “An American sentence is written in a different way”? What is a chart showing the proportion of
- graduates to work in different sectors of the economy in the UK in 2004. In a verbal presentation
- the figure below shows the percentage of graduates working in different sectors of the economy in the UK in 2004. In a paper or report,
what is the information for which it is sought?