What’s the best sentence form to insert in list of demands?

What is the proper verb form to use in a list of requirement?

What are the essential requirements of a board

  • member with no Bloodship relationship with a director?
Asked on March 25, 2021 in Grammar.
Add Comment
2 Answer(s)

What does it mean when you think you’re saying: “Each board member (verb) (requirement)”? He’s syllable,

  she looks at the sentence as if she's saying "Each board member" (requirement).  

In this example, the subject is Each board member.

Almost every one is an individual. In a word, this narrows down your options a bit.

What are some good choices you must make since you finished

  reading?  

Should not have or shouldn’t have isn’t terribly firm, but it works in this context.

Does not have is firm, but it doesn’t quite work if we’re trying to express a requirement (a should, a must, or a shall ).

Should not have is very firm.

Shall not have is very firm, and also very formal and authoritative. Think strict legalese.

Obviously, you can change the verb / verb tense and remove ‘not’ where necessary. Example (if using must): Must have, must be, must sign, must not be, etc. In addition, you have the flexibility to mix and match these to suit the firmness level of each requirement.

What’s the best way to look at the options available to you? Any of these work, and none of them are technically incorrect – ultimately, the final decision belongs to the artists and writers who were in charge of drafting the

document.

Answered on March 26, 2021.
Add Comment

What does it mean when you think you’re saying: “Each board member (verb) (requirement)”? He’s syllable,

  she looks at the sentence as if she's saying "Each board member" (requirement).  

In this example, the subject is Each board member.

Almost every one is an individual. In a word, this narrows down your options a bit.

What are some good choices you must make since you finished

  reading?  

Should not have or shouldn’t have isn’t terribly firm, but it works in this context.

Does not have is firm, but it doesn’t quite work if we’re trying to express a requirement (a should, a must, or a shall ).

Should not have is very firm.

Shall not have is very firm, and also very formal and authoritative. Think strict legalese.

Obviously, you can change the verb / verb tense and remove ‘not’ where necessary. Example (if using must): Must have, must be, must sign, must not be, etc. In addition, you have the flexibility to mix and match these to suit the firmness level of each requirement.

What’s the best way to look at the options available to you? Any of these work, and none of them are technically incorrect – ultimately, the final decision belongs to the artists and writers who were in charge of drafting the

document.

Answered on March 26, 2021.
Add Comment

Your Answer

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.