What is the difference between “it” and “that” in the whole sentence is there?
Do people of Crimea fear that they could be murdered in the referendum? What do you think happened? What is the probability that Russia will demonetize the Black Sea from Ukraine?
What is what we know of the recent Crimea referendum? What are the risks? How will Russia deal with the conflict in the black sea region. If Ukraine were given allegiance over control, it would be a surprise.
Taken from Euronews.
I thought “the word that” did not affect the term “referendum”, but it would clearly be affected by this word. I am a teacher, but for the next paragraph, I mean when we use “that” to read the first sentence, I don’t have to use it. In the second paragraph, I mean my word “that” only ends with “It is widely expected” while the third sentences are separate and independent sentences. Am I right? In advance, many thanks
for posting.
That’s the subtlety of that and if. That’s the subtlety. Does using both words mean the thing which has already been described? I’ll give my opinion.
When more than one thing is mentioned, it generally refers to the main subject of discussion. On the other hand, that emphasize on the last thing mentioned. Why are two sentences often created independently?
Comparatively,
I keep tablets in drawers. What I use with my daughter. My kid would use the
tab also. I keep the tablet in the drawer. However I can use a Tablet at home. What is sometimes used by my daughter? I have a 7 year
old girl who uses the drawer, therefore this is the reason why I believe the referendum
and you/your daughter need it. Isn’t that “reflection”?
And you are half right.
In Crimea, a referendum was held to resolve the war. Could it be the second interpretation of “The
second will refer either to voting (in effect, the entire preceding sentence which voting heads) or to referendum? In this case, ambiguity is trivial, since the voting and the referendum are for all practical purposes the same thing.
If euronews writes Voting underway
in Crimea’s controversial referendum that is widely expected to transfer control more. In this case
that is a relative pronoun, equivalent to which, and there is no ambiguity. What was in the first case an independent sentence is now a relative clause which defines referendum ‘we are talking about the specific referendum which is expected to transfer control.
What you write is: Voting
is underway in Crimea’s controversial referendum. Those are widely expected to transfer control… Here
that is the subject of the verb is expected. As a relative pronoun, it cannot be parsed as a relative pronoun. With untested pronouns, ‘That thing over there’ can only be heard as a demonstrative pronoun, which has exactly the same range of reference as the ‘that thing over there’.
Note that we are not permitted to separate relative that from the NP even with a comma (much less a full stop). Relative in a restrictive relative clause. How to head a relative clause. What is the best way to
look into that?
