I am tempted to suggest Phallical or Phallicness. Please don’t miss the words! I can not justify it by means of actual usage, or even a direct dictionary entry but it appears to be the most valid option under the rules of morphological derivation. In the context of linguistics, the Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia defines morphology as:

The science of structure, or of forms, in language. It is that division of the study of language which deals with the origin and function of inflections and derivational forms, (or) of the more Formal as distinguished from the more material part of speech.

Dictionaries tend not to list every valid derivation, in part because they’re too numerous and so in part because the definition should be axiomatic, based upon the root word and maybe the surrounding context of the word.

And this is not my objective, so if I do read dictionaries or the term “do not” then I won’t be able to proffer the best explanation. It is for these reasons that most people like to create a list of relevant words near the entry for the applicable affix in a simple matter. What do some of the words begin with ”/”; ”? or ‘’’? Sometimes it is possible to combine affixes to achieve a certain result, such as in the word convincingly (which is simply the word convince with the -ing and -ly affixes tacked onto it as you can see in the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language A.M.D.E.). (H.D.E.L.), 5th edition. The 1913 Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary (W.I.R. ). R.U.D. (Rag) notes that the -ness suffix can be used to form abstract abstract nouns from adjectives through exemplification of the adjective good. A.K.D.E.L. notes that the -ness suffix indicates state, quality, condition or degree.
I personally prefer the Phallicness spelling to the Phallicalness one mostly because a search on onelook’s reverse dictionary search engine reveals almost three times as many icalness words than there are words which go directly from ic to ness 1. with ^the exact numbers being 80 compared to 25. While icalness is more complex than icness, suggesting that -icalness is the grammatically sounder derivation. Furthermore, I like the -ness suffix specifically because it specifically notes degree as you requested, unlike the -ity suffix, which is also in A.H.D.E.L. but only as noting state or quality.

Is there a way to know what exactly these types of options actually see when used? I have a search for phallicity and phallicity which barely see anything using comparison root word phallic in google ngrams. The only ones that receive Google ngram results are phallicity and phallicness which barely see any usage at all in comparison root word phallic on Google Ngrams. Between the derivations noting state 2, ^phallicity is the first, with a brief period of usage at the end of the 1920s and a resurgence in the 1950s. How Can Phallicness Be Common? Merely: When was the only time they were more popular than phallicity? Nonetheless, between the forms that were actually used in print, I prefer phallicness in this case, since you specify a need to possibly signify degree which is the domain of the -ness sufix.

¹ These search results for *icness and *icalness are backed up on The Internet Archive.

² A screenshot backup of the Google Ngram results can be found on Postimg: Here is the complete ngrams result, and here is the comparison between just phallicness and phallicity.

The word in use meaning ‘the state or quality of being phallic’ is ‘phallicity’:

phallicity 1.
What is phallic?

Wikimedia Commons has

media related to the word “Concepcion” (UK) Use of the word is limited. Google returns 3,340 results and Amazon returns 286 results. In reality, no-once-word, n.

a word apparently used only ‘for the nonce’ at all, is more complex & more complex than merely the language itself, meaning the way things are, i.e. “nonce” in terms of the English language. on one specific occasion or in one specific text or writer’s work.

. OED Online – Howosa : http://oeed.org/ What is your review of September 2016? Oxford University Press. OED: http://www.oed.com/view/entry/127827? redirectedFrom=nonce+word (accessed September 28, 2016). As

a side note, ‘nonce-word’, as the definition explains, started as a nonce-word but is no longer one.) The use

of ‘phallicity’, as revealed by examining the Google Books search results in three domains: psychoanalysis, literary criticism, and feminism. Its history in use ranges from sometime before 1957, in psychoanalysis,

This passivity she is forced to oppose because it is the anal-sadistic equivalent to what in phallicity is the quality “castrated”.

( The psychoanalytic review, 1913-1957 ) to

the present day, as evidenced by the results of Google searches as well as the latest Google Books attestation, She use

the joke for her own fun and ‘gifts it with the absence of a lesbian phallus’). (The latter two will be a significant part of her memoirs in the next couple to date, her writings are nearly all of the same to date. Karin Sellberg and Michael O’Rourke coined the term “Gaga’s tele-dildonics” and continue the discussion about her phallicity, and refer to her ‘girlboner” as what Butler calls a transferable phantasm’.

) ( Queer Tracks: Subversive Strategies in Rock and Pop Music, Doris Leibetseder May 23, 2016).

Most uses are in texts pertaining to or derived from psychology.

I believe in a nonce word such as “phallicity” or “phallicitude” in this situation.

Sadly the nearest plausible alternative actually in use, ” phallicism “, already serves to refer to the worship of the phallus (as a symbol of its generative purpose in nature).

Would probably stretch to fit this usage.

Priapic is a synonym for phallic:

adjective

1. (sometimes initial capital letter) of or relating to Priapus; phallic.
2. characterized by or emphasizing a phallus: priapic figurines.
3. (of an image) suggestive of or resembling a phallus by its shape.
4. a way of getting over the exaggerated concern about masculinity and male sexuality.

(Word dictionary) Why

is persistent erection termed as an issue of runningdy behavior? How can I contribute to com(.com) ). However, it is sometimes used figuratively, and in a way similar to the desired sense. ^Why

is Architectural Priapism used to describe skyscrapers, popularized (coined) by Leon Krier and made memorable by his cartoon of the London building known as the Gherkin’s.

A custom “ultimate hot-rod” was actually called the Priapism. An art

critic for the Observer talks about the “modest priapism and slight swagger” of an installation featuring candlesticks set on high stools to depict revolutionary leaders. This last example is particularly useful, as it hints at the term’s utility for expressing the degree to which an object is phallic.

So for the OP’s example, one could say

This beer stein’s priapism (that’s over the top), is over the top.

^The phrase also used figuratively to mean something like aggressive-masculinity or aggressive excitement, as in this JSTOR Daily article (“capitalist priapism”) or this history book (France’s “political priapism”).

What does the malefactor neologism mean?

“Male” corresponds to “phallus” in the OP’s question, and “factor” corresponds to “degree or quality”.

“Mainefactor (male’-factor) is a bit over the top. The size of this beer” is a bit over the top. ”

“Do you think it is weird to talk about it?