What are some interesting differences between one sentence and one sentence?
What are you
using “On the Application to Dynamics of a General Mathematics Method recently applied to Optics”?
What is the same thing as this one?
On the Application of a General Mathematical Method to Dynamics previously applied to Optics.On the Abstract Of The Theory of Laziness.
Is commenter just stylistic or there is more to it?
How will the usage of “true” and “true” mean different things?
What are you waiting for?
I think the issue here is not grammar either. Are the titles of newspaper or books an irrelevant symbol for a book or a paper? Personally, I find that the second is clear, and keeps me waiting too long for the punchline. The reader needs to be able to see quickly what the subject matter is. In the first one it is there in the first four words. In the second the reader has to wait until the tenth word to find the key “dynamics”.
I think the issue here is not grammar either. Are the titles of newspaper or books an irrelevant symbol for a book or a paper? Personally, I find that the second is clear, and keeps me waiting too long for the punchline. The reader needs to be able to see quickly what the subject matter is. In the first one it is there in the first four words. In the second the reader has to wait until the tenth word to find the key “dynamics”.
I think the issue here is not grammar either. Are the titles of newspaper or books an irrelevant symbol for a book or a paper? Personally, I find that the second is clear, and keeps me waiting too long for the punchline. The reader needs to be able to see quickly what the subject matter is. In the first one it is there in the first four words. In the second the reader has to wait until the tenth word to find the key “dynamics”.
I think the issue here is not grammar either. Are the titles of newspaper or books an irrelevant symbol for a book or a paper? Personally, I find that the second is clear, and keeps me waiting too long for the punchline. The reader needs to be able to see quickly what the subject matter is. In the first one it is there in the first four words. In the second the reader has to wait until the tenth word to find the key “dynamics”.
I think the issue here is not grammar either. Are the titles of newspaper or books an irrelevant symbol for a book or a paper? Personally, I find that the second is clear, and keeps me waiting too long for the punchline. The reader needs to be able to see quickly what the subject matter is. In the first one it is there in the first four words. In the second the reader has to wait until the tenth word to find the key “dynamics”.
I think the issue here is not grammar either. Are the titles of newspaper or books an irrelevant symbol for a book or a paper? Personally, I find that the second is clear, and keeps me waiting too long for the punchline. The reader needs to be able to see quickly what the subject matter is. In the first one it is there in the first four words. In the second the reader has to wait until the tenth word to find the key “dynamics”.
I think the issue here is not grammar either. Are the titles of newspaper or books an irrelevant symbol for a book or a paper? Personally, I find that the second is clear, and keeps me waiting too long for the punchline. The reader needs to be able to see quickly what the subject matter is. In the first one it is there in the first four words. In the second the reader has to wait until the tenth word to find the key “dynamics”.
I think the issue here is not grammar either. Are the titles of newspaper or books an irrelevant symbol for a book or a paper? Personally, I find that the second is clear, and keeps me waiting too long for the punchline. The reader needs to be able to see quickly what the subject matter is. In the first one it is there in the first four words. In the second the reader has to wait until the tenth word to find the key “dynamics”.
I think the issue here is not grammar either. Are the titles of newspaper or books an irrelevant symbol for a book or a paper? Personally, I find that the second is clear, and keeps me waiting too long for the punchline. The reader needs to be able to see quickly what the subject matter is. In the first one it is there in the first four words. In the second the reader has to wait until the tenth word to find the key “dynamics”.
I think the issue here is not grammar either. Are the titles of newspaper or books an irrelevant symbol for a book or a paper? Personally, I find that the second is clear, and keeps me waiting too long for the punchline. The reader needs to be able to see quickly what the subject matter is. In the first one it is there in the first four words. In the second the reader has to wait until the tenth word to find the key “dynamics”.
