Under scrutiny sentence, is it correct?
Some people
think governments should take measures regarding health of individual’s.. Original text: Other think it must be managed by individuals.
Is
it bad enough to depend on governments to dictate on their terms the healthy lifestyle of a person?
Which
one should I use under scrutiny? What are some synonyms?
What is the meaning of scrutiny that is a negative word?
I would like some advice!
How do I get the word “celebrate” of this statement?
In a context of due diligence, it is not always correct
to use a standard scrutiny approach. This started as a comment but got too long… This is too long.
I won’t agree or disagree with your quote, but I do believe in you and your opinion.
In your example scrutiny seems to imply prying (which is negative) but not take measures doesn’t have this implication.
For example, a possible measure if free health checks is mandated? Is the health check not a public health check? And is there government information on the check?
On the other hand, if you had to fill in a lifestyle survey and send it to a government office, then that would (or could) be prying.
What should I start by saying what you have said, but its added to an already sentence that isn’t a fair way to put things.?
Is scrutiny for lack of opinion negative?
What can an alternative be either of the
- following: Some people opine that it should be the government to take measures concerning the health of its people. Others think the affair should be handled on their own.
- How the government enforces the healthier lifestyle of its people? Do people think it’s a matter that you all should sort out by yourself?
Hope this helps, everybody.
Is there a way to learn about this subject?
