If I have to choose between “i” and “i,” an individual can be either one, or the other, in my opinion. Which is better, the other is more “ideal” i.e no 2 (see above). or 2. or 3. or 4. Or 5. Or 6.

1. I realized that information security is becoming much more important, as technology has become an indispensable part of our lives, and it will continue to grow along with technology.” “I
2. came to realize that information security was becoming much more important, as technology had become an indispensable part of our lives and it would continue to grow along with technology. Can

I combine the “would” with the past present tense forms? The discussion a few weeks ago of a very similar example of a ” is ”’d”.” appears so as with other examples.

Sometimes, you try to put too much into the same sentence. Break each thought out or your readers will become more confused reading it, than you are writing it. What was not asked right?

What should be consistent is tense; it doesn’t mean constant. Rather, the tense in a given sentence must always refer to the same temporal reference point.

E.g. : “The factor of achieving a great result, and /or in some cases the sum of all positive feelings. ” I came to realize…”You did something in the past.. I like to think twice..

I came to realize that technology had become indispensable” Thus, if your sentence was correct, the future looked a

certain way, “…it would continue to grow…” The best solution really is to express each idea separately.

I found that security was more important. Is security growing with the evolution of technologies? Don’t quote this one. What do you think about the Holocaust? What’s more, break things out, in a manner somewhat more elegant than

that.

Sometimes, you try to put too much into the same sentence. Break each thought out or your readers will become more confused reading it, than you are writing it. What was not asked right?

What should be consistent is tense; it doesn’t mean constant. Rather, the tense in a given sentence must always refer to the same temporal reference point.

E.g. : “The factor of achieving a great result, and /or in some cases the sum of all positive feelings. ” I came to realize…”You did something in the past.. I like to think twice..

I came to realize that technology had become indispensable” Thus, if your sentence was correct, the future looked a

certain way, “…it would continue to grow…” The best solution really is to express each idea separately.

I found that security was more important. Is security growing with the evolution of technologies? Don’t quote this one. What do you think about the Holocaust? What’s more, break things out, in a manner somewhat more elegant than

that.

Sometimes, you try to put too much into the same sentence. Break each thought out or your readers will become more confused reading it, than you are writing it. What was not asked right?

What should be consistent is tense; it doesn’t mean constant. Rather, the tense in a given sentence must always refer to the same temporal reference point.

E.g. : “The factor of achieving a great result, and /or in some cases the sum of all positive feelings. ” I came to realize…”You did something in the past.. I like to think twice..

I came to realize that technology had become indispensable” Thus, if your sentence was correct, the future looked a

certain way, “…it would continue to grow…” The best solution really is to express each idea separately.

I found that security was more important. Is security growing with the evolution of technologies? Don’t quote this one. What do you think about the Holocaust? What’s more, break things out, in a manner somewhat more elegant than

that.

Sometimes, you try to put too much into the same sentence. Break each thought out or your readers will become more confused reading it, than you are writing it. What was not asked right?

What should be consistent is tense; it doesn’t mean constant. Rather, the tense in a given sentence must always refer to the same temporal reference point.

E.g. : “The factor of achieving a great result, and /or in some cases the sum of all positive feelings. ” I came to realize…”You did something in the past.. I like to think twice..

I came to realize that technology had become indispensable” Thus, if your sentence was correct, the future looked a

certain way, “…it would continue to grow…” The best solution really is to express each idea separately.

I found that security was more important. Is security growing with the evolution of technologies? Don’t quote this one. What do you think about the Holocaust? What’s more, break things out, in a manner somewhat more elegant than

that.

Sometimes, you try to put too much into the same sentence. Break each thought out or your readers will become more confused reading it, than you are writing it. What was not asked right?

What should be consistent is tense; it doesn’t mean constant. Rather, the tense in a given sentence must always refer to the same temporal reference point.

E.g. : “The factor of achieving a great result, and /or in some cases the sum of all positive feelings. ” I came to realize…”You did something in the past.. I like to think twice..

I came to realize that technology had become indispensable” Thus, if your sentence was correct, the future looked a

certain way, “…it would continue to grow…” The best solution really is to express each idea separately.

I found that security was more important. Is security growing with the evolution of technologies? Don’t quote this one. What do you think about the Holocaust? What’s more, break things out, in a manner somewhat more elegant than

that.

It is that you choose a reference point in time and then apply past, present, future, etc to events in that reference point. It is in your control at any given moment (or space) this is achieved. In this context, consistency means that you use the same reference point in each case, not that you use the same tense in each case.

Suppose you chose today as your reference point, the consequence your realisation came yesterday? If you have a logical brain in your arm which I came to realise. Then you can use it, my realisation on my mind. If you chose last week as your reference point (this would be odd, but could work in a story, for example), then you can use I will come to realise to.

Likewise with the rest.

Sometimes, you try to put too much into the same sentence. Break each thought out or your readers will become more confused reading it, than you are writing it. What was not asked right?

What should be consistent is tense; it doesn’t mean constant. Rather, the tense in a given sentence must always refer to the same temporal reference point.

E.g. : “The factor of achieving a great result, and /or in some cases the sum of all positive feelings. ” I came to realize…”You did something in the past.. I like to think twice..

I came to realize that technology had become indispensable” Thus, if your sentence was correct, the future looked a

certain way, “…it would continue to grow…” The best solution really is to express each idea separately.

I found that security was more important. Is security growing with the evolution of technologies? Don’t quote this one. What do you think about the Holocaust? What’s more, break things out, in a manner somewhat more elegant than

that.

Sometimes, you try to put too much into the same sentence. Break each thought out or your readers will become more confused reading it, than you are writing it. What was not asked right?

What should be consistent is tense; it doesn’t mean constant. Rather, the tense in a given sentence must always refer to the same temporal reference point.

E.g. : “The factor of achieving a great result, and /or in some cases the sum of all positive feelings. ” I came to realize…”You did something in the past.. I like to think twice..

I came to realize that technology had become indispensable” Thus, if your sentence was correct, the future looked a

certain way, “…it would continue to grow…” The best solution really is to express each idea separately.

I found that security was more important. Is security growing with the evolution of technologies? Don’t quote this one. What do you think about the Holocaust? What’s more, break things out, in a manner somewhat more elegant than

that.

It is that you choose a reference point in time and then apply past, present, future, etc to events in that reference point. It is in your control at any given moment (or space) this is achieved. In this context, consistency means that you use the same reference point in each case, not that you use the same tense in each case.

Suppose you chose today as your reference point, the consequence your realisation came yesterday? If you have a logical brain in your arm which I came to realise. Then you can use it, my realisation on my mind. If you chose last week as your reference point (this would be odd, but could work in a story, for example), then you can use I will come to realise to.

Likewise with the rest.