The most effective way to give reason by explaining the reason
Why are there 100% correct fixings in the 80% of the table? In contrast to correct fixings, there are some incorrect fittings mainly because of missing lines or distorted graph relations due to the absence of small segments, mismatch of parameters or under-segmentation.
This is bit odd & as I don’t have experience with explaining this type of case. What can I modify in a more formal way to present this idea?
Obviously, as a native-speaker, an English writer will be paying a premium, this effect will hurt a higher percentage of writers. How do I stay cool while repeating things?
- Employ uncontracted structural devices—repeated prepositions, for instance, or frank either… or constructions—to make the’shape’ of your argument more evident.
- Employ the full range of punctuation as a structural device—use colons and semicolons, and don’t try to get too much in one sentence.
- What are your three main arguments, so that you are clear
- where you are going? 80%
- of ‘fixings’ are correct Most of the rest are not corrected for
- one of two reasons Some are incorrect
- because lines are missing Others are incorrect because
- graph relations are distorted Distorted graph
- relations are caused by: The
- absence of
- small
segments Mismatched parameters Under-segmentation
The table shows that 80% of fixings are correct. What are some of the wrong graph relation(s) of graph relationship(s)? Distorted graph relations are caused by the absence of small segments, by mismatched parameters, or by undersegmentation.
What are advantages of being a professional athlete?
