Should ‘Should’ vs ‘If’?
I’ve noticed that sometimes people use’should’ instead of ‘if ‘. Whereas here I’m going with’should ‘, if it’s ‘if’?
For example:
‘Your mission, if you choose to accept it’
or
‘Your mission, if you choose to accept it’
Another example:
‘You must evacuate if there is a fire’
or
‘You must evacuate should there be a fire’
Are they always interchangable?
Can you please help me with information of the definition of “toadshot”?
An example pair tells the opposite of you.
If there is fire there is a real possibility you will become stranded.
What if anything happens to the house and people in it are forced to evacuate.
What is good in subjunctive mood? What are some subjunctives which can be a good thing? I am an English student at Leeds. They might even consider you wrong or even “backward”. The point is that modern English did not force the subjunctive with if but it did with should. I, not sure why this is the case, but it could be there’s a greater air of uncertainty with should, I think it is kind of your anticipation of the possibility along with the possibility itself.
When you want to move a word in a sentence, you should consider the effects.
- Go to the store and buy some milk.
- What is a good time to go to the milk store?
- Should you go to the grocery store and buy milk?
- If you can go to the supermarket buy milk.
A change from a command to a suggestion is necessary to make a conditional suggestion. The same happened for the command in the form of the conditional command. How did #4 the Should end up saying “OK?” As it was all about the previous two lines in the story. I’ve been watching #3’s OP. Thanks to everyone who has seen this. If in # 4 does not do that; it is just a dry, logical if, then
construct, to form a ‘then’.
Is is more like being a conditional as in if this occurs, while should is more like being forced in the condition. Why should the condition be forced? I know that I
should do what I perceive as “to do things well”.
