Replacing must when conveying logical deduction.
Can I use have to/ have got to to substitute must when expressing an inference? Let’s take this sentence for example.
There must be a catch
for all of us. There has to be
a catch.
Can I use have to/ have got to to substitute must when expressing an inference? Let’s take this sentence for example.
There must be a catch
for all of us. There has to be
a catch.