“need not to be neither atomic nor ordered”

Is this negative triple, double and triple grammatically sound?

When space in a disk is allocated sequentially then the data is systematically determined but writing operations don’t need to take place either atomic or ordinarily. This is a typical example of ordered operations.

Explanation:

Words neither emphasize on the fact that both conditions are (independently) allowed to remain unsatisfied, that both are option: n.d. To be more formal, ” need not be atomic and need not be ordered “. And then again, it becomes a concoction of two negations joined by a conjunction.

Asked on March 28, 2021 in Grammar.
Add Comment
8 Answer(s)

It appears that the sentence as written was over-negated. What to do? Conjactian: You don’t want to use not (neither) and not (neither) together. But you should! “Need


not to be,” is also grammatically incorrect.

Do you think you need to be”? Remark about what the uncontracted “equivalent of that would be “do not need to be” If you are using auxiliary “do” you need to use the auxiliary “do” because it is negative.

When you don’t include “do” you can use a separate construction, “need not be,” where “need” functions a bit like an auxiliary. I believe in the right definition the use between “to” and

“to” should not be after “to” before the infinitive. You can only use the end in a more general sense.

Answered on May 29, 2021.
Add Comment

It appears that the sentence as written was over-negated. What to do? Conjactian: You don’t want to use not (neither) and not (neither) together. But you should! “Need


not to be,” is also grammatically incorrect.

Do you think you need to be”? Remark about what the uncontracted “equivalent of that would be “do not need to be” If you are using auxiliary “do” you need to use the auxiliary “do” because it is negative.

When you don’t include “do” you can use a separate construction, “need not be,” where “need” functions a bit like an auxiliary. I believe in the right definition the use between “to” and

“to” should not be after “to” before the infinitive. You can only use the end in a more general sense.

Answered on June 6, 2021.
Add Comment

As with most Boolean expressions, you can factor this out to be:

Ordered operations require that space on disk is allocated sequentially, so that spatial ordering corresponds to the chronology of operations, but actual disk writes need not be either atomic or ordered. C eady

How can I earn a good salary without paying it?

Answered on June 7, 2021.
Add Comment

As with most Boolean expressions, you can factor this out to be:

Ordered operations require that space on disk is allocated sequentially, so that spatial ordering corresponds to the chronology of operations, but actual disk writes need not be either atomic or ordered. C eady

How can I earn a good salary without paying it?

Answered on June 11, 2021.
Add Comment

It appears that the sentence as written was over-negated. What to do? Conjactian: You don’t want to use not (neither) and not (neither) together. But you should! “Need


not to be,” is also grammatically incorrect.

Do you think you need to be”? Remark about what the uncontracted “equivalent of that would be “do not need to be” If you are using auxiliary “do” you need to use the auxiliary “do” because it is negative.

When you don’t include “do” you can use a separate construction, “need not be,” where “need” functions a bit like an auxiliary. I believe in the right definition the use between “to” and

“to” should not be after “to” before the infinitive. You can only use the end in a more general sense.

Answered on June 2, 2021.
Add Comment

As with most Boolean expressions, you can factor this out to be:

Ordered operations require that space on disk is allocated sequentially, so that spatial ordering corresponds to the chronology of operations, but actual disk writes need not be either atomic or ordered. C eady

How can I earn a good salary without paying it?

Answered on June 8, 2021.
Add Comment

As with most Boolean expressions, you can factor this out to be:

Ordered operations require that space on disk is allocated sequentially, so that spatial ordering corresponds to the chronology of operations, but actual disk writes need not be either atomic or ordered. C eady

How can I earn a good salary without paying it?

Answered on June 10, 2021.
Add Comment

As with most Boolean expressions, you can factor this out to be:

Ordered operations require that space on disk is allocated sequentially, so that spatial ordering corresponds to the chronology of operations, but actual disk writes need not be either atomic or ordered. C eady

How can I earn a good salary without paying it?

Answered on June 11, 2021.
Add Comment

Your Answer

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.