Meaning of ‘not permitted’ in “A or in B”
Why does “not permitted in A or in B” mean “not permitted in A and not permitted in B”?
What am I missing in the answers?
What is a good quote?
What is the meaning of a phrase? What is its meaning? What is it unclear? What does it seem like?
Is A nor B also forbidden to use this word?
Mostly of the time, it would probably indicate the first option. I want to be in A or B. That is a violation of the rule; and indeed, yes just that you are not permitted there. If only your family had been in. (A or B) = (!)! A) and (!? What
is the problem with the second interpretation is that it would be highly ambiguous about exactly what was being being prohibited (does the listener get to choose one of A or B to avoid?), and would not be a useful piece
of communication.
Mostly of the time, it would probably indicate the first option. I want to be in A or B. That is a violation of the rule; and indeed, yes just that you are not permitted there. If only your family had been in. (A or B) = (!)! A) and (!? What
is the problem with the second interpretation is that it would be highly ambiguous about exactly what was being being prohibited (does the listener get to choose one of A or B to avoid?), and would not be a useful piece
of communication.
What is the meaning of a phrase? What is its meaning? What is it unclear? What does it seem like?
Is A nor B also forbidden to use this word?
Mostly of the time, it would probably indicate the first option. I want to be in A or B. That is a violation of the rule; and indeed, yes just that you are not permitted there. If only your family had been in. (A or B) = (!)! A) and (!? What
is the problem with the second interpretation is that it would be highly ambiguous about exactly what was being being prohibited (does the listener get to choose one of A or B to avoid?), and would not be a useful piece
of communication.
Mostly of the time, it would probably indicate the first option. I want to be in A or B. That is a violation of the rule; and indeed, yes just that you are not permitted there. If only your family had been in. (A or B) = (!)! A) and (!? What
is the problem with the second interpretation is that it would be highly ambiguous about exactly what was being being prohibited (does the listener get to choose one of A or B to avoid?), and would not be a useful piece
of communication.
