In Donald Brown’s book that has the same title, he wrote: The

UP have government,

in the sense that they have public affairs and these affairs

are regulated and in the sense that decisions binding on a collectivity are made. The UP get government. Some of the regulation takes place in a framework of corporate statuses (statuses with orderly procedures for perpetuating membership in them).

What are some UP leaders? The UP admires generosity, and this is particularly desired in a leader. No leader of the UP could have power in himself. In the final months, it would not really change. Let him go. UP leaders go beyond the limits of UP reason and morality. From a political standpoint, since the UP didn’t have any democracy, they always have an oligarchy. (from what I know of mistakes by the UP)

The UP have law, at least in the sense of rules of membership in perpetual social units and in the sense of rights and obligations attached to persons or other statuses.

What is the definition of Universal People?

What is “corporate statusing”? I don’t quite understand the meaning of each word of this phrase Corporate (permanent) statuses, because each of is different things. Why did he choose corporate or status here, in this context, and I would not know the answer despite a good amount of time and research?

Could you please explain this term? Or write a word to the same slang. or it’s better to write

another word (or more important) that has the same meaning.