Is there any way to use an “who” in wording in a clause instead of a “whom”?
Why does it make great sense for the brothers of two brothers to be called unfilial? Is
it possible to use “who” in a sentence instead of “whom” if “neither of” is used?
What should I do a week after the recent prank?
As Jason Bassford said, I need to do a more significant rewrite to make it work. Here is why the paper is worth their cost. If I say no to who, then you cannot replace with
whom in the following sentence. This lead to constant bickering between the brothers, who don’t want to be called unfilial.
If you don’t know already, the word “whom” is used when “who” is the object in a sentence and following a preposition. “Who” is used when dealing with a topic.
In the rewritten sentence, “who” has become the subject of the subordinate clause beginning “who don’t want…?
