Is the usage ‘was to have done’ correct?

… Washington intervened Monday and “advised” NAM participants as well as Ban to turn Tehran down on its nuclear tour, which was to have included the suspected nuclear-related explosives testing lab… Is

it correct? How is it different from “was to include” or “would have included”?

What is the best way to review my bio?

Asked on March 2, 2021 in Other.
Add Comment
0 Answer(s)

Your Answer

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.