Is the second sentence right?
It indicated that eating food varies significantly with animal size whereas drinking water did not vary significantly with animal size (see Table 1).
Are there two consonants in a sentence with it being That and Where?
What does it feel like to work at school?
How can I learn something from you?
It indicated that eating food varied significantly with animal size, whereas drinking water did not vary significantly with animal size.
It is correct to associate with something between words “there” and “whereas.” Whereas joins together clauses. “That” specifies a clause (see M-W: that — conjunction ). However, there’s nothing wrong with “that” and “whereas” in the example, they are both used appropriately.
Do you’ve found two other varied labels? With do or did, the present tense be required. It indicated that
eating food varied significantly with animal size, whereas drinking water did not vary significantly with animal size.
I would really like to simplify your sentence. What if you see a direct comparison like this, where one case is just the negation of the other, you can repeat a redundant portion? The second case is understood to parallel the first case. If you could end a sentence with “did
not”: It indicated that eating food varied significantly with animal size, whereas drinking water did not.
What do you mean by “shorty”?
