Is it wrong to use specific verbs instead of have?
What are the pros and cons of using the “have” verb at some situations like
She had a coffee
She was having breakfast
Instead of
She drank breakfast I
think the “have” verb
is a general auxiliary verb which can fit with many predicate words. Which combination of these will be more effective and effective in certain situations?
Do people use more verbs than has? If you are asking an innocent question like a’no’ then the answer is a lot wrong.’ I don’t know their answers but in many places it’s not natural sounding. English has a lot of verbs which can be considered poly-purpose. Has is one of these verbs. What is ‘Have’? As a multi-purpose verb it can be used for various grammatical structures, set phrases and idiomatic meanings. If you want to sound natural, rather than sounding like someone who is translating, I suggest you try to use ‘have’ the way a native speaker would. I believe there are many good expressions and you’ll also see some grammar structure on this link for grammar reasons. What is
a free dictionary that are in no time to see?
At what point does your book show you how many people actually speak?
Especially in spoken English, we find that people will use a general verb like “have” even when a more specific one is possible. This is true especially if the specific meaning is understood from the noun. In English English authors try to use more expressive language: “I had breakfast” could be better express as “I enjoyed breakfast” “I
had breakfast” or “I grabbed breakfast” In careful writing, a more specific word is usually preferred.
