What is stack exchange and what is stackbase?

Use ‘II’ as subject. Use my character as an object to read? In your example, you would use “me”. Both ‘Bob’ and’me’ are the objects of the preposition ‘for.’ ” “To talk” is a separate infinitive phrase.

Why does the matter appear clear and clear? I am slightly embarrassed to say

that I don’t think I need someone to speak to me. So I am simply saying: “Thank you for initiating this opportunity for me”.

I am really frustrated as Bob was offended

when we accidentally mentioned that I would be doing a conversation in bed. Thank you.

Thank you for instituating

that Bob and I can meet. What should we say?

What is Huddleston and Pullum say about the Cambridge Grammar of the English Language? Here is a lengthy extract from their Preliminaries chapter (pp6-5):

One kind of illegitimate argument is based on analogy between one area of grammar and another. Consider yet another construction where there is variation between nominative and accusative forms of pronouns:

a. i. 1. I had lunch with my parents and they were friendly. The food was surprisingly good.

b. I was disappointed to see my partner and I have been invited to lunch.

The ‘%’ symbol is again used to mark the B example as typically used by some speakers of -set, except other languages, though this time it is not a matter of regional variation. The status of the construction in B differs from that of It’s me, which is undisputedly normal in informal use, and from that of! Me and Kim saw her leave, which is unver able non-standard.

What is different is that examples like B are regularly used by a significant proportion of speakers of English and not generally thought by ordinary speakers to be non-standard; they pass unnoticed in broadcast speech all the time.

Prescriptivists, however, condemn the use illustrated by 3b, insisting that the ‘correct’ form is They invited my partner and me to lunch.I have never been deceived and I insist that it is an error.Do you really think there is a question on 3b? But here, again, they seek to justify their claim that 3b is ungrammatical by an implicit analogy, this time with other situations found in English, such as the example seen in A. In A the pronoun functions by itself as direct object of the verb and invariably appears in accusative case. What is different in B is that the direct object of the verb is the form of coordination, not a single pronoun. What is similar in GC is that the verb has sprite. Prescriptivists commonly take it for granted that this difference is irrelevant to case assignment. If we have an accusative in B, they argue that because we have an accusative in A we should also have an accusative in B so the nominative I is ungrammatical (it can be written as a ‘good’ A’)?

How do we differentiate between a coordinated and a non-coordinated pronoun? The rules are sensitive to this distinction – for almost all speakers, not just those that speak them: 4. A. By enforcing both clauses of that fourth sentence,

you are not helping any one of your speakers in this case. I don’t know if you are eligible to receive a scholarship.

4 b. (Jeff. 5:6). 3: (James 1:2) I don’t know if she is eligible or if she does.

The sequence you are can be reduced to you’re in A, where you is subject, but not in B, where the subject has the form of coordinates of pronouns.

What is the difference between coordinating pronouns and pronouns and why can’t one rule actually apply? Is there a rule likewise for difference between 3a and 3b? Is our analogy wrong? Whether 3b is treated as correct Standard English or not (a matter that we take up in Ch. 5, 16.2). 2) cannot be successfully argued to be correct simply by virtue of the analogy with 3a.

And indeed there are numerous examples on Google of the “for x and I ” construction: it

was so much fun for Bob and I to see each other as grandparents.

Which is the happiest day of my 25 years of life so far?

For Bob and I this has been a step of faith to get away so soon… by being so far from home our entire lives.

“He had work for me and Bob.”

This is such a fantastic day for Bob and I…

For Bob and I the scheduled departure time from Taipei differ by 3.40 hours.

It took a bit of practice, but Bob and I had a few stabs at getting some of our crazy sticks.

I doubt that many of the ” for x and I ” users were knowingly “differentiating) between a coordinated and a non-coordinated pronoun “. How can we avoid hypercorrection and the examples seem more likely to result from hyper-correction based on dim recollections of their English teachers castigating them for constructions such as ‘bob and me went swimming “.

In my opinion, rather more people are likely to consider ” for Bob and I ” a mistake than ” for Bob and me “. What you choose, when and

how should you make it.

Thank you for starting the chance for Bob and I to discuss.

As: Thank you for initiating the opportunity for Bob and for for me to talk.

When ‘for” means ‘because’ you can write ‘for I’.

For I know the plans I have for you,

For I know you are as much in love as I am

for I see no time refunded for the pursuit.

In a search engine, put “for I ” in the search string on your computer’s search bar!

What can we learn from historical experiences in India?