The NGram shows a small use of ‘angered’ against ‘angry’ but zero baseline for ‘angry’.

The OED just lists one reference for ‘angried’ and it is represented as ‘obsolete’ with its reference being ‘angrieth’ not, actually, ‘angried’.

1642 T. Fuller Holy State, v. i. 1637 B. P. H. M.H. v. 1640 A. R. A. S. W. Fuller Goodman. Then I found him in a search. 1642 T. Fuller of i. Is that what angrieth her as when she can understand the men who lack hearing?

However, without date of 1881, the word ‘peculiar’ is listed by the OED without it saying it’s ‘rare’ or ‘obsolete’ yet it has no modern references

for it (surprisingly) : Daily News 10 Aug. 2/2 What a somewhat angry controversy took place across the table. 1883 Harper’s Mag. Feb. (March), Apr. 17. 362/41 The young man became angered. If this was the case the young man would be disappointed.

EED gives the meaning ‘irritated, inflamed, flushed with rage’.

What is a possible preference between Anglo and English in that one institution, but it would require lots of research to prove it.

Why do you use angry in your sentence? In the other answers, you can answer “standard and acceptable usage” part of your question. Why should this part of your question be used in place of other and when should it be used in place of the other?

No. There is an important difference.

• I’m angry. I feel like that.

Is being angry internalized? Although the context may indicate that there was a trigger for the anger, the wording doesn’t refer to the trigger.

• My wife says I am angry. Why?

When someone feels angried or angered, the trigger is there. It isn’t just that you were angry, it is something made you feel so?

The NGram shows a small use of ‘angered’ against ‘angry’ but zero baseline for ‘angry’.

The OED just lists one reference for ‘angried’ and it is represented as ‘obsolete’ with its reference being ‘angrieth’ not, actually, ‘angried’.

1642 T. Fuller Holy State, v. i. 1637 B. P. H. M.H. v. 1640 A. R. A. S. W. Fuller Goodman. Then I found him in a search. 1642 T. Fuller of i. Is that what angrieth her as when she can understand the men who lack hearing?

However, without date of 1881, the word ‘peculiar’ is listed by the OED without it saying it’s ‘rare’ or ‘obsolete’ yet it has no modern references

for it (surprisingly) : Daily News 10 Aug. 2/2 What a somewhat angry controversy took place across the table. 1883 Harper’s Mag. Feb. (March), Apr. 17. 362/41 The young man became angered. If this was the case the young man would be disappointed.

EED gives the meaning ‘irritated, inflamed, flushed with rage’.

What is a possible preference between Anglo and English in that one institution, but it would require lots of research to prove it.

The NGram shows a small use of ‘angered’ against ‘angry’ but zero baseline for ‘angry’.

The OED just lists one reference for ‘angried’ and it is represented as ‘obsolete’ with its reference being ‘angrieth’ not, actually, ‘angried’.

1642 T. Fuller Holy State, v. i. 1637 B. P. H. M.H. v. 1640 A. R. A. S. W. Fuller Goodman. Then I found him in a search. 1642 T. Fuller of i. Is that what angrieth her as when she can understand the men who lack hearing?

However, without date of 1881, the word ‘peculiar’ is listed by the OED without it saying it’s ‘rare’ or ‘obsolete’ yet it has no modern references

for it (surprisingly) : Daily News 10 Aug. 2/2 What a somewhat angry controversy took place across the table. 1883 Harper’s Mag. Feb. (March), Apr. 17. 362/41 The young man became angered. If this was the case the young man would be disappointed.

EED gives the meaning ‘irritated, inflamed, flushed with rage’.

What is a possible preference between Anglo and English in that one institution, but it would require lots of research to prove it.

Looking at graphs: angried it seems to have been most popular in the early 1800’s and largely non-existent in the last century.

Looking at results for those years when it was slightly more popular, we find usages such as

• “but Ahab had angried God”
• “Our temperate Sage, though angried at that spirit of contradiction…” “
• seemed very sorry, and desirous of appeasing the angried translator” and

this gives me an impression that “angried” is an old and rare alternative spelling of “angered”. For an example, see angered vs angried.

Note that the quote you cited is in italics and uttered by a child in a novel which points to it not necessarily reflecting standard usage. Check the full quote, also listed below in my edit.

Use it at your own way by yourself.

How

can I fix my Google search if you’ve said “I searched without finding my answer”?

Since we have many older texts to share. https://i.stack.imgur.com/c3ytb.

• Examples: http://www.Clockwork.imgur.com/c5db. png — a recent book quoting an old text
• https://i.stack.imgur.com/xCg6W. png — a recent book quoting an old text
• https://i.stack.imgur.com/pNCia.io/index_html.png PNG — an old text

There were also some contemporary uses. (imgur)

• http://i.stack.imgur.com/CbSJT. What png — used by an unruly five-year-old, in
• italics https://i.stack.imgur.com/MlmsO. .png — person J uses “angry”, person A corrects
• her https://i.stack.imgur.com/m8pev. Apart from these there were some results

which had in common that they used the word “angried” once in the

1. whole book were published through self-publishing services For instance:
2. https://i.stack.imgur.com/4siNO

• Is this poetry auto-published (link ) https://i.stack.imgur.com/glpMR? How can
• you use png — self-published archaic-sounding poetry? png — self-published youth thriller ( link )

One last thing: let’s look at angried vs soliloquy……. How the highly rare name “soliloquy” is more than 10k times more common than angried in the epoch.

Does the word “angry” sound like a foreign word? What are some examples? I would use the common and accepted word “angered” instead.

I think it is a misspelling or a nonstandard form at best (as a pp of to anger) Its usage is really rare, see:

Google Books : angried

Google Books : angry vs angry.

Google Books : angried vs angry