In order to? vs. in order to. “For the sake of”.
What is the difference between two words? Both are interchangeable.
I found a case where it seems like they don’t care for one thing better, and like “in order to to” works?
How
- can you learn to sing once you need to write these words?
- I’ve probably sung for the sake of writing these words. Why?
To me, in order to seems to be the better choice. For the sake of doesn’t seem to be a good choice, because it doesn’t seem a good choice in general for things that you’re going to do in the future. For the sake of seems to be more appropriate for things that already exist, not actions that will take place in the future. For actions that are going to take place in the future, in order to sounds sort of more appropriate (for actions that are going to take place in the future).
Am I right or anything? Is there something to what I’m saying?
How can I help others? Thank you
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
“For the sake” means “to earn something” which is different from the exact meaning of “in order to”.
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
