I have difficulty in understanding usage of being and being.
I have encountered some sentences relating to being while reading some books. I like these few sentences, but I can’t remember what they mean. All the sentences in this page don’t make sense. I’m not actually in it. Could you explain me using beings for different sentences?
-
If the parameters of a constructor don’t, in and of themselves, describe the object being returned, a static factory with a well-chosen name is easier to use and the resulting client code easier to read.
-
Why do Object Oriented Programming work the opposite way? They are organized around data, with the key principle being “data controlling access to data.” (example here: “data Control of Access to Code) “The
-
block being labeled can be a stand-alone block, or a statement that has a block as its target.
When I pay my attention usage of the beings following past participle forms of verb comes after a
name.
Passive construction: X being + past participle = a passive construction of sentence. 1) Is a static factory easy to use or client code easier to read?
The key principle is = where the key principle is = same meaning 2) Object oriented programming works the other way around. In data, where the key principle is “data controlling access tocode and data.. “. All data are data. All code are information. The data are, however, organized. All the code is, one data. All the code. All the code. All the code. All of code. All of the data, all all code. All code is from the data, all code is data, all code. ”
3) has the same structure as 1) // 3) The block that is being labeled can be a stand-alone block, or a statement that has a block as its target.
being + past participle, is a passive construction. Is the principle of a discussion or explanation to be explained here very difficult or not to understand?
Where X is Y becomes VERSUS.
A participle directly following a noun phrase is usually identical unchanged in meaning if the words “Who/who is/was/are/were” are inserted between the noun phrase and the participle: this is known to grammarians as “WHIZ-deletion”. No matter whether the participle is an (active) present participle: “The man
walking along the road” = “The man who is/was walking along the road” or a
past participle: “The job
finished last Thursday” = “The job which was finished last Thursday”.
Where construction with “being” effectively forms a present continuous passive fulliciple: “The
object being returned” = “the object which is being returned.” (This differs from “the object returned] only in that it is setting the temporal focus during the return object, instead of treating the return as a point event.
The block is being labelled Likewise “The block being labeled] is different from “The block labeled]” in focussing on the on-going process of labelling it
What is the difference between example 2 and being in your example 2? What is an absolute clause? Such clauses usually have their verbs as participles, and here, the verb is “be”, in participal form. The meaning of “with the key principle being… ” is not very different from “and the key principle is… “.
