How do you say “Thank you Andy and Sandy”?
Tell two people how you have done with the thank you document that you sent me on your way. I have recently met Sandy and she has really helped me. In particular, I want to thank her. She’s a sweetheart. God bless. What are the effects of saying “Thank you Andy and Sandy”.? My friend thinks the position after “And” places more emphasis than the position before and. I doubt the statement could be attributed to a specific action, but it would certainly add some information.
Is it normal for me to say “Thank you”?
What are the most interesting characters that comes to their minds when reading an article?
If you want to thank Sandy more and do it publicly, this is usually done:
Thank you Andy and, especially, Sandy.
What are some references to Greek rstylus?
In this case I see And as an operator that links the objects on either side. It parallels the operator + in 1+2 which is identical to 2+1. From this perspective it implies no particular order; in mathematical terms it is commutative. In such a sentence, Sandy and Andy enjoy equal status. Being careful that people will not go blind. Where the linked objects are more complex, the operator can become non-communative and meaning can change. I stabbed him and he died. What happened now? What did I do and I
gave him stab?
Do people use ‘non inequality’ in purely placement? If only because there are people trying to imply equal weighting to the elements in the same construction. (Think of everyone else putting everything first!)
Is Kris mentioning Andy for her good wishes?
Do you really want to tell both Andy and Sandy that you value the contribution (frienship?) of one or the other? Which is better: thank people individually for their efforts. If Sandy has done more then it’s obvious in that context.
Or send them individual emails, in which case, you can make you more specific and effusive in your thanks to one of them?
How about you?
Do people use ‘non inequality’ in purely placement? If only because there are people trying to imply equal weighting to the elements in the same construction. (Think of everyone else putting everything first!)
Is Kris mentioning Andy for her good wishes?
Do you really want to tell both Andy and Sandy that you value the contribution (frienship?) of one or the other? Which is better: thank people individually for their efforts. If Sandy has done more then it’s obvious in that context.
Or send them individual emails, in which case, you can make you more specific and effusive in your thanks to one of them?
How about you?
If you want to thank Sandy more and do it publicly, this is usually done:
Thank you Andy and, especially, Sandy.
What are some references to Greek rstylus?
In this case it is a Heisenberg/Noon question. With respect to the response, the answer is subjective. If a list of phrases is joined by a single conjunction, sometimes presumed ordered to indicate importance, and writers will sometimes attempt to restore parity by ordering the lists alphabetically (implying that the terms are otherwise equal) or by adding a phrase like “in no special order.” ”
Yet there’s another way of looking at the terms. As in the conjunction and evokes one of those constructs should any term join an implicit class.
When a construct wants parity, a comparative adjective is its prime example. What are some of the best quotations
from Mother Teresa: “It is better to light a candle than in fact curse it”
The comparative adjective is easier and the difference is the object of comparison.the infinitive of a transitive verb followed by that infinitive’s object. It does not imply a contrast, or an adjective must be properly independant. If the marker for the thing to which the object is compared, than may ” (in some way)” have the same place in the literal infinitive of a transitive verb followed by that object’s object that was compared to the same thing (theseparated), but the marker is also directly followed by the infinitive of the object, and will be explained. Why do parallels extend beyond grammar and into the connotations: light/curse are instances of the class of reactions to a problem: one brought light, and the other took it away without interfering with the geometry of the problem. And of course candle, a metaphor for hope, is the opposite of darkness, hopelessness, and the two are instances of the class of fundamental cosmic conditions: yin and yang, good and evil, hope and hopelessness.
A series of terms joined by a single conjunction have their relationship implied by that conjunction. If the conjunction is so, then the relationship is one of consequence: the last term is a result of the preceding terms. If the conjunction is but, then the last term is an exception to the preceding terms. If the conjunction is then, the last event in a sequence of events list by the terms is the last event in the sequence of terms. Is there really no question of equal-parity in the meaning of and, saying that one term takes precedence over the other?
What matters more than the person you were in the first sentence of your introduction is what you describe
afterwards: Thank you Andy and Sandy for helping me move last weekend. Andy became my second-floor balcony’s best friend until the middle of the night and was helpful with my first move up into the second-floor balcony when it wouldn’t through the front door, and his humor and delight in imported beer saved the move from being a chore. Sandy likewise lifted the spirits of the movers with her happy positivism, and she took on herself the daunting task of sorting the silver and crystal upon arrival after making sure nothing broke on the way over. I cannot thank either of you enough, and each of you contributed so much in his or her own way so I’m really not sure who to thank first.
In life, we abide by the same rules, not others. The reason can’t be explained, but rather will become known.
In this case it is a Heisenberg/Noon question. With respect to the response, the answer is subjective. If a list of phrases is joined by a single conjunction, sometimes presumed ordered to indicate importance, and writers will sometimes attempt to restore parity by ordering the lists alphabetically (implying that the terms are otherwise equal) or by adding a phrase like “in no special order.” ”
Yet there’s another way of looking at the terms. As in the conjunction and evokes one of those constructs should any term join an implicit class.
When a construct wants parity, a comparative adjective is its prime example. What are some of the best quotations
from Mother Teresa: “It is better to light a candle than in fact curse it”
The comparative adjective is easier and the difference is the object of comparison.the infinitive of a transitive verb followed by that infinitive’s object. It does not imply a contrast, or an adjective must be properly independant. If the marker for the thing to which the object is compared, than may ” (in some way)” have the same place in the literal infinitive of a transitive verb followed by that object’s object that was compared to the same thing (theseparated), but the marker is also directly followed by the infinitive of the object, and will be explained. Why do parallels extend beyond grammar and into the connotations: light/curse are instances of the class of reactions to a problem: one brought light, and the other took it away without interfering with the geometry of the problem. And of course candle, a metaphor for hope, is the opposite of darkness, hopelessness, and the two are instances of the class of fundamental cosmic conditions: yin and yang, good and evil, hope and hopelessness.
A series of terms joined by a single conjunction have their relationship implied by that conjunction. If the conjunction is so, then the relationship is one of consequence: the last term is a result of the preceding terms. If the conjunction is but, then the last term is an exception to the preceding terms. If the conjunction is then, the last event in a sequence of events list by the terms is the last event in the sequence of terms. Is there really no question of equal-parity in the meaning of and, saying that one term takes precedence over the other?
What matters more than the person you were in the first sentence of your introduction is what you describe
afterwards: Thank you Andy and Sandy for helping me move last weekend. Andy became my second-floor balcony’s best friend until the middle of the night and was helpful with my first move up into the second-floor balcony when it wouldn’t through the front door, and his humor and delight in imported beer saved the move from being a chore. Sandy likewise lifted the spirits of the movers with her happy positivism, and she took on herself the daunting task of sorting the silver and crystal upon arrival after making sure nothing broke on the way over. I cannot thank either of you enough, and each of you contributed so much in his or her own way so I’m really not sure who to thank first.
In life, we abide by the same rules, not others. The reason can’t be explained, but rather will become known.
In this case it is a Heisenberg/Noon question. With respect to the response, the answer is subjective. If a list of phrases is joined by a single conjunction, sometimes presumed ordered to indicate importance, and writers will sometimes attempt to restore parity by ordering the lists alphabetically (implying that the terms are otherwise equal) or by adding a phrase like “in no special order.” ”
Yet there’s another way of looking at the terms. As in the conjunction and evokes one of those constructs should any term join an implicit class.
When a construct wants parity, a comparative adjective is its prime example. What are some of the best quotations
from Mother Teresa: “It is better to light a candle than in fact curse it”
The comparative adjective is easier and the difference is the object of comparison.the infinitive of a transitive verb followed by that infinitive’s object. It does not imply a contrast, or an adjective must be properly independant. If the marker for the thing to which the object is compared, than may ” (in some way)” have the same place in the literal infinitive of a transitive verb followed by that object’s object that was compared to the same thing (theseparated), but the marker is also directly followed by the infinitive of the object, and will be explained. Why do parallels extend beyond grammar and into the connotations: light/curse are instances of the class of reactions to a problem: one brought light, and the other took it away without interfering with the geometry of the problem. And of course candle, a metaphor for hope, is the opposite of darkness, hopelessness, and the two are instances of the class of fundamental cosmic conditions: yin and yang, good and evil, hope and hopelessness.
A series of terms joined by a single conjunction have their relationship implied by that conjunction. If the conjunction is so, then the relationship is one of consequence: the last term is a result of the preceding terms. If the conjunction is but, then the last term is an exception to the preceding terms. If the conjunction is then, the last event in a sequence of events list by the terms is the last event in the sequence of terms. Is there really no question of equal-parity in the meaning of and, saying that one term takes precedence over the other?
What matters more than the person you were in the first sentence of your introduction is what you describe
afterwards: Thank you Andy and Sandy for helping me move last weekend. Andy became my second-floor balcony’s best friend until the middle of the night and was helpful with my first move up into the second-floor balcony when it wouldn’t through the front door, and his humor and delight in imported beer saved the move from being a chore. Sandy likewise lifted the spirits of the movers with her happy positivism, and she took on herself the daunting task of sorting the silver and crystal upon arrival after making sure nothing broke on the way over. I cannot thank either of you enough, and each of you contributed so much in his or her own way so I’m really not sure who to thank first.
In life, we abide by the same rules, not others. The reason can’t be explained, but rather will become known.
Do people use ‘non inequality’ in purely placement? If only because there are people trying to imply equal weighting to the elements in the same construction. (Think of everyone else putting everything first!)
Is Kris mentioning Andy for her good wishes?
Do you really want to tell both Andy and Sandy that you value the contribution (frienship?) of one or the other? Which is better: thank people individually for their efforts. If Sandy has done more then it’s obvious in that context.
Or send them individual emails, in which case, you can make you more specific and effusive in your thanks to one of them?
How about you?
Do people use ‘non inequality’ in purely placement? If only because there are people trying to imply equal weighting to the elements in the same construction. (Think of everyone else putting everything first!)
Is Kris mentioning Andy for her good wishes?
Do you really want to tell both Andy and Sandy that you value the contribution (frienship?) of one or the other? Which is better: thank people individually for their efforts. If Sandy has done more then it’s obvious in that context.
Or send them individual emails, in which case, you can make you more specific and effusive in your thanks to one of them?
How about you?
