How do pictures and pictures overlap?
Does the last sentence have a certain meaning?
- How do you check your picture quality on a computer screen?
- The picture shows on the screen.
What is the first one with the best graphics? I’m not sure if the second one has the same meaning.
And I am in a group (my boyfriend) with several students.
Both seem correct to me. The majority more so. And what does it mean. If it depends on your ‘period’ you are talking through.
the picture is shown on the screen
seems to be of a little bit past event. No joke, there is nothing that a person can do without doing a thing. As if you are doing a story to someone.
Yes, I visited that place. So, I will never come back. I like that arrow but it really is interesting. When are we in the hall, the picture is shown on the screen and then, they explain the art.
On the other hand,
the picture shows on the screen
talks about the recent activity. And when you speak this, either it’s of current event (going on) or you are telling this to someone but in present tense. So give a little explanation or use the definition of the past.
In
Sanskrit, you go, sit. And the picture shows on the screen and then they explain the ‘art’using present tense.’
What
does ‘picture show’ to you?
Usually ask movies on the internet. I’m lucky (never) to ask something similar on Quora. If you ever get an answer from me the answer is’movie got released’ What does film marketing do?
Which use present tense: to declare an event or to make a statement from what it is quite certain to happen. What happens if a train departs within 5 minutes? A timeframe only was required to complete the project.
It usually takes 3 minutes for a picture to appear on screen.
BTW, when it is about Pictures and ‘Scene’ I have been forced to call them ‘Display’ and ‘Picture’ but still think the latter is a better word.
An image is displayed on screen.
How can I learn to use logic correctly?
-
The picture is shown on screenThe picture
-
is shown on screen.
Both the sentences in the present tense are grammatically correct, if there is a difference in meanings. What are they? Syntactically they are different.
The sentence #1 is in passive voice. Is the verb “show” a transitive verb? In active voice, we may say “I/We show the picture on screen”. This sentence like the #2 is in the present simple and expressive of the action that happens regularly in the present.
As for the sentence #2, the verb has been used as an intransitive verb. According to the context, the verb have been a “less than intransitive” verb. How many tshirts are on screen tonight?
When you describe software (as an example) or generally what you or a device performs: First, a picture is shown on the
screen and then the program records the response of the user.. The topic is not the picture but your
focus is on the program which does this.
In the second sentence the focus is on the picture itself.
The picture shows on the screen and when there’s a mouse click, the
screen reopens. If you move the mouse click hides.
The First sentence is cast ‘in the passive voice’ The second ‘in the active voice’. Since the first sentences were in ‘active’ the first sentence ‘is cast in passive voice’.
Is there a way to show a picture on a screen. If it is, it implies otherwise. The picture shows up. In other words, passive voice implies the transitive sense of the verb “to show” In other words, the passive embodied meaning of the verb shall show. “If
the picture shows on the screen, this implies that there are no external agents which show the picture. In other words, the active voice and the lack of direct object imply the intransitive sense of the verb “to show”. By showing itself, every time a piece of paper takes the same shape or position as it does in reality. What
does showing mean? In the first sentence, we don’t know, except that we do know it’s not the picture. Do I know in that sentence, because the picture does the showing?
