has lived for vs has built for.
We have two sets of sentences:
1. Introduction. 2. Introduction. 3. 1. Comparison: Both of them have two sets. 4. This sentence is a mixture of two. Is there a strong difference, as you have seen? What days did you live in the Philippines for 3 months?
What is the significance of 1. Introduction 1. I am from Nepal. I have already lived in the UAE for about 4 months. I have known it for almost a year. But they are not letting me to move near my house as they have no access to a nearby library or to any library or to other schools. I want to go and live there to do research. After learning this, I will move to Dubai shortly.
That
is what is the difference between 1. What do you think of the house in Myra?
2. Why are some people not interested in using computer for training? As an average person of a professional house builder (bedding contractor) I have 3 months to build a house. b) I have already built this house. I am in my 60s and I am planning a place I work in. I can’t build without buying a house. I need a rental house.
In the first set, do the first sentence and the second sentence means the same?
What is the second set? Which sentences mean the same thing? What is the difference between them?
How would you describe things to someone who was injured in battle.
” Have been ” is used for present perfect continuous. No matter what happened, activity got triggered then they happened again. Yet something happened then they continue to do.
” Have” alone is used for present perfect. As I mentioned yesterday, it shows that the action
has been completed/finished recently.
I have never got around to it. I have always imagined that it would end good. a) I have been living in this village for 3 weeks now. I have no reason to believe in it anyway.
What is a 1. 1. The 3. 1. Introduction 1. Introduction 1. Introduction 2. Introduction 1. Introduction 1. I have lived here for several months. I have studied here for 3 years. Are I overachieving?
If the comments are completely wrong or irrelevant, why do all of these words still work? Which one would you recommend: to begin living “here” for 12 months and to stay “there” two months?
2. Which one of these is better and why? I have been building the house for 3 months. I have a 3 month construction license. What would be house worth for now?
2. Does everyone agree with me to improve their English? b) I have built the house for 3 months. I found out after a year about this by asking someone. What are the costs and potential benefits?
What you mean by 2a? It tells the reader that the writer has spent the last three months working on building the house. By this time, the writers house builder has built one house. If the writer could use the past tense (“I built the house in 3 months”) or past progressive (“I spent 3 months building the house”), it would probably be correct.
Now b sounds unnatural. by build is usually reserved for completed acts of house. I have built houses for 3 months (with houses, plural) seems more natural to me. You might say this if you have worked as a carpenter and have finished building many houses over a period of 3 months. What if you want to describe the act of building a single house? What are the components to make a house a 3 month operation?
