Do you see questions about participle clauses?
Good evening guys! I read Gold Proficiency Maximiser, I found this chart worth discussing. I have a few questions for you. Let’s start:.
1. 1. Infrared light. It was already 7:00, everyone had no more questions to ask and everyone were happy.
When I use a participle clause what is the subject of the participle clause? Why are some of the exceptions at the beginning of rule writing such as this common “usually” thing? Does this sentence have two subjects “Nobody” and “the meeting” or I’m wrong?
2. Our new system of payment is easy to use. Is there any reason that women perform this task better than men?
In some common expressions,however,the participle clause can be given its own subject”. Does an element of “women” here in the clause mean ‘participle’ or’math’?
What is the reason for not using an ATM to pay bills? She whistled shrilly. She wanted him to get attention,she kept on shriking.
Why is “having wanted” accurate despite that they wrote that all the (wanting to), (wanted by) and (having wanted to) are possible to use? If you could give me an example of “wanted by” in a sentence together with its meaning?
What are your thoughts on this.
-
In my English sentence yes, you have two subjects. What are the two subjects? Is this possible if the participial clause is an absolute construction, formed by Subject + Participle? No subject in participial clause and no subject of the main clause. In this case it is the same as subject of party clause.”
-
Phrases like “generally speaking”, “broadly speaking”, “strictly speaking”, etc. can be said to be exceptions to the rule you mentioned about the partyial clause usually sharing the same subject of the main clause.
-
Was she meant to catch everyone’s attention without him whistling (for instance)? Isn’t it funny that she whistled to catch his attention?
What is the point of using Q2C on PBS?
