Did they say “I can have cheeseburger” really correct?
I am an e-learning teacher and I need a grammar and style plugin for my word processor. I use ECS. I don’t understand grammar but I use it correctly. I don’t need anything. I found LanguageTool. I really like that tool. I learnt about programming. I read that there was no languageTool option but I could have gone of it without knowing language. And I think that I am wrong! When I typed the phrase “Shucks, cheeseburger?” on that page, I typed the phrase “i have Cheeseburger? There is a correction it made to do to an argument and the rebuke it made is with some exception.
Does “I can have Cheeseburger?” accurately mean, or is it NOT a good tool to use at all?
In terms of economy, the government is playing down the idea of universal rights.
Why is “Can I have cheeseburger” meaning ungrammamatically? What is the basis for a cheeseburger? If
you really want a cheeseburger, should you ask the question? If so, how is it made? “It
all happened “… And now we know because of being so stupid about it. “
I can have cheeseburger – could they write something correct? What is the question is whether cheeseburger is non-countable? If you had to have a cheeseburger, and you’d say “I can have it” would be appropriate.
What kinds of protein can I consume?
I can have fish. You andI. Is beef good? You: Yes, even with dairy; I can have cheeseburger.
I mean, is this a little contrived. Is it really acceptable to say “I have fish”), since fish can be countable or uncountable? Could a cheeseburger be both?
Is it really that easy to sift the bone from the marrow in a grammar checker? I don’t think this use is warranted but others may think it and don’t. Watch the vote count online.
If I can approve someone or not, so does it also mean I
can’t have approval.
I can have cheeseburger – could they write something correct? What is the question is whether cheeseburger is non-countable? If you had to have a cheeseburger, and you’d say “I can have it” would be appropriate.
What kinds of protein can I consume?
I can have fish. You andI. Is beef good? You: Yes, even with dairy; I can have cheeseburger.
I mean, is this a little contrived. Is it really acceptable to say “I have fish”), since fish can be countable or uncountable? Could a cheeseburger be both?
Is it really that easy to sift the bone from the marrow in a grammar checker? I don’t think this use is warranted but others may think it and don’t. Watch the vote count online.
If I can approve someone or not, so does it also mean I
can’t have approval.
I can have cheeseburger – could they write something correct? What is the question is whether cheeseburger is non-countable? If you had to have a cheeseburger, and you’d say “I can have it” would be appropriate.
What kinds of protein can I consume?
I can have fish. You andI. Is beef good? You: Yes, even with dairy; I can have cheeseburger.
I mean, is this a little contrived. Is it really acceptable to say “I have fish”), since fish can be countable or uncountable? Could a cheeseburger be both?
Is it really that easy to sift the bone from the marrow in a grammar checker? I don’t think this use is warranted but others may think it and don’t. Watch the vote count online.
If I can approve someone or not, so does it also mean I
can’t have approval.
Is it possible to make a machine-readable grammar checker. While they do detect errors, they are no longer capable of replacing experience and education when a good grammar checker cannot be used?
In this case, the software detects I can has, which is never correct, and so flags it for correction to can have. It does not detect that cheeseburger is usually a count noun and would ordinarily take an article, e.g. an article instead of a count noun. What are some good cheeseburgers?
Any of the ideas given below are plausible. Ordinarily is not the same as never. If you can’t find a number in a cheeseburger? Could be adjective for a type of meal. It could be used as a mass noun, say, if ground beef and cheese were mixed up and used as a pizza topping. What’s the flavor, as for a packaged snack food? In a natural environment, red, yellow and brown colour are the same. What could be a newly coined philosophical idea, or a dance move, or architectural element, or anything else the author may have defined upstream in the document. In any of those cases, yes I can have cheeseburger would be completley correct.
How does context make a
choice?
Is it possible to make a machine-readable grammar checker. While they do detect errors, they are no longer capable of replacing experience and education when a good grammar checker cannot be used?
In this case, the software detects I can has, which is never correct, and so flags it for correction to can have. It does not detect that cheeseburger is usually a count noun and would ordinarily take an article, e.g. an article instead of a count noun. What are some good cheeseburgers?
Any of the ideas given below are plausible. Ordinarily is not the same as never. If you can’t find a number in a cheeseburger? Could be adjective for a type of meal. It could be used as a mass noun, say, if ground beef and cheese were mixed up and used as a pizza topping. What’s the flavor, as for a packaged snack food? In a natural environment, red, yellow and brown colour are the same. What could be a newly coined philosophical idea, or a dance move, or architectural element, or anything else the author may have defined upstream in the document. In any of those cases, yes I can have cheeseburger would be completley correct.
How does context make a
choice?
Grammar checkers are fully capable of checking generalisation rules that are given in programming language. This rule requires at least a minimum version of grammatical rules so it cannot be ignored. In a game, they don’t check your grammar or your answers. They just check it! With all of the gadgets I already possess in my life, I could easily spot any wrongdoing and if I knew I was wrong, I would put them to good use. But I would not give anything I can a self-study tool.
In your case you give it a deliberately mangled sentence, which is a bit of an unfair test. Does automatic grammar check suggest changing word order anyway? there are too many permutations, and changing the word order can effect the meaning of a sentence significantly.
I know this is more of a comment, but it was too long, and besides the answer the question needs may not be the answer the questioner was looking for.
(Tiny details)
Is it possible to make a machine-readable grammar checker. While they do detect errors, they are no longer capable of replacing experience and education when a good grammar checker cannot be used?
In this case, the software detects I can has, which is never correct, and so flags it for correction to can have. It does not detect that cheeseburger is usually a count noun and would ordinarily take an article, e.g. an article instead of a count noun. What are some good cheeseburgers?
Any of the ideas given below are plausible. Ordinarily is not the same as never. If you can’t find a number in a cheeseburger? Could be adjective for a type of meal. It could be used as a mass noun, say, if ground beef and cheese were mixed up and used as a pizza topping. What’s the flavor, as for a packaged snack food? In a natural environment, red, yellow and brown colour are the same. What could be a newly coined philosophical idea, or a dance move, or architectural element, or anything else the author may have defined upstream in the document. In any of those cases, yes I can have cheeseburger would be completley correct.
How does context make a
choice?
Grammar checkers are fully capable of checking generalisation rules that are given in programming language. This rule requires at least a minimum version of grammatical rules so it cannot be ignored. In a game, they don’t check your grammar or your answers. They just check it! With all of the gadgets I already possess in my life, I could easily spot any wrongdoing and if I knew I was wrong, I would put them to good use. But I would not give anything I can a self-study tool.
In your case you give it a deliberately mangled sentence, which is a bit of an unfair test. Does automatic grammar check suggest changing word order anyway? there are too many permutations, and changing the word order can effect the meaning of a sentence significantly.
I know this is more of a comment, but it was too long, and besides the answer the question needs may not be the answer the questioner was looking for.
(Tiny details)
Is it possible to make a machine-readable grammar checker. While they do detect errors, they are no longer capable of replacing experience and education when a good grammar checker cannot be used?
In this case, the software detects I can has, which is never correct, and so flags it for correction to can have. It does not detect that cheeseburger is usually a count noun and would ordinarily take an article, e.g. an article instead of a count noun. What are some good cheeseburgers?
Any of the ideas given below are plausible. Ordinarily is not the same as never. If you can’t find a number in a cheeseburger? Could be adjective for a type of meal. It could be used as a mass noun, say, if ground beef and cheese were mixed up and used as a pizza topping. What’s the flavor, as for a packaged snack food? In a natural environment, red, yellow and brown colour are the same. What could be a newly coined philosophical idea, or a dance move, or architectural element, or anything else the author may have defined upstream in the document. In any of those cases, yes I can have cheeseburger would be completley correct.
How does context make a
choice?
