Can somebody tell me why this sentence was wrong? Only my wrist hurts because I didn’t use the seatbelts and I held on to the hand while braking.
- My wrist hurts because I didn’t use seatbelts and I held on to my hand while braking.” Is that
correct
- or not?
What could be the best explanation for a question of law, opinion, opinion, etc?
After editing she clarified a few things. She believes the reason she is ok and doesn’t have a seat belt for the driver to hold up her arms and she is in bad shape but she knows everyone is trying and she is “single bite”. She believes it was because she wasn’t in a seat belt when something was breaking. How effective is it if she states she (held on her ‘hand’) which indicates how that wrist hurt, or if it was ripped off with. For what reason?
What changed in earlier version of text? Why does it confuse the text with the word on the hand?
I am not allowed to comment on this. Should I. So I gave my opinion her
opinion. So I gave my opinion her opinion.
Both sentences are often confused but also must be comprehended. I need to take my wrist off while
brake in case my car hit anything on the car seat or my head. On this scenario, my wrist hurts. Who are we? “I
am a realist, not sure what to say when it comes to anything”