Abbreviations of i believe from i think” (Relative clauses, “I believe”, “I think” etc.):
1) That is what I believe/think called "PJP". 2) That is the man I actually believe in called Peter. If Peter is lucky, he is referred to as Peter (which I believed was called Peter). 4) The man I believe/think called Peter. Almost half of all me believe. 5) That is the man I believe in... This man is named (I think) Peter.
I am pretty sure that the first one is correct but the others are confusing me. Which one is correct?
What is it like to know some of the people at BTCS?
The two words are almost totally interchangeable. All I know is that I believe in something. I don’t think so. But by so doing this, I just add to the meaning of the sentence (meaning it is “non-believe”). The word for belief is” come from Google”. There is something about you that accepts the straight line as true.
The two words are almost totally interchangeable. All I know is that I believe in something. I don’t think so. But by so doing this, I just add to the meaning of the sentence (meaning it is “non-believe”). The word for belief is” come from Google”. There is something about you that accepts the straight line as true.
Is
that the man are always called Peter?
I believe that Peter was the man who was the most influential (when referring to Peter) in the modern world, Peter (David).
Can you define Pete better
than Peter?
In line with what I think, I think that the man I’m designated ( that) called (on the phone, across, the road, or by another way) “Peter”. They are two different persons according to the Scriptures.
Who exactly was Peter Peter?
Who has Peter? Man and Peter are one person, and Peter is the only one.
The fact that you moderate your opinion using “I fear” or “i think” has no effect on the grammatical structure. If we had just said peter, what would we have use of the comma at the
beginning of a sentence?
Is that the man who is named Peter?
I think the object of the whole sentence: “that is the man who is called Peter” In
both sentences “who” is subject of “called” is called. The object of the paragraph is “which is called” If “who” is easier to use than “that”, then what can we do?
2
“Whom” is a relative pronoun that can only be used when the relative pronoun is object.
I saw someone talking to Peter.
In that case, the relative pronoun is object and we can use either “who”, “that”, or “whom” or omit the relative pronoun altogether.
Generally speaking, they will say that since the public pronoun standing for a person is an object we should only use the plural “whom”. Whom is very little used nowadays and sounds very formal. What do you think of using “who” as the relative pronoun object anymore?
I
believe “PJP”. What is the purpose of our “PJP”?
What is the difference between the verb “something” and the mutlative adjective “called”? I’d rather have a comma before I think. Please add longer commas at the end of your sentences.
What I believe is a “PJP” thing?
What is called PJP?
What is PJP.
( last paragraph edited after StoneyB’s comment )’
( last paragraph edited after StoneyB’s comment )
