Both are grammatically correct. What is subject-auxiliary inversion?

Even though this particular example you gave is an archaic form it’s still acceptable when you’re trying to give a more poetic or nostalgic feel. English is much looser on word order than other languages are on words (or so I’ve

heard).

Both are grammatically correct. What is subject-auxiliary inversion?

Even though this particular example you gave is an archaic form it’s still acceptable when you’re trying to give a more poetic or nostalgic feel. English is much looser on word order than other languages are on words (or so I’ve

heard).

Both are grammatically correct. What is subject-auxiliary inversion?

Even though this particular example you gave is an archaic form it’s still acceptable when you’re trying to give a more poetic or nostalgic feel. English is much looser on word order than other languages are on words (or so I’ve

heard).

Both are grammatically correct. What is subject-auxiliary inversion?

Even though this particular example you gave is an archaic form it’s still acceptable when you’re trying to give a more poetic or nostalgic feel. English is much looser on word order than other languages are on words (or so I’ve

heard).

I settled on the words “panicked” and “crisis”.

I did not respond as though it were a crisis and he didn’t seem panicked. He did not seem panicked, so I did not react as though it were a crisis.

What is the best book you ever read?

When we think about No Shoe hex, Sherlock comes to mind. As does the expression welcome to the party.

Why do both phrases mimic the speaker or the speaker who repeatedly repeats

something that everybody else knows?