Post-purchase rationalization is a cognitive bias, also known as

Buyer’s Stockholm Syndrome, whereby someone who has purchased an expensive product or service overlooks any faults or defects in order to justify their purchase. As a case of choice-supportive bias, there is no exception.

Does this answer to your question in Q7 are real?

You know that I do.

Post-purchase rationalization is a cognitive bias, also known as

Buyer’s Stockholm Syndrome, whereby someone who has purchased an expensive product or service overlooks any faults or defects in order to justify their purchase. As a case of choice-supportive bias, there is no exception.

Does this answer to your question in Q7 are real?

You know that I do.

Post-purchase rationalization is a cognitive bias, also known as

Buyer’s Stockholm Syndrome, whereby someone who has purchased an expensive product or service overlooks any faults or defects in order to justify their purchase. As a case of choice-supportive bias, there is no exception.

Does this answer to your question in Q7 are real?

You know that I do.

Post-purchase rationalization is a cognitive bias, also known as

Buyer’s Stockholm Syndrome, whereby someone who has purchased an expensive product or service overlooks any faults or defects in order to justify their purchase. As a case of choice-supportive bias, there is no exception.

Does this answer to your question in Q7 are real?

You know that I do.

Post-purchase rationalization is a cognitive bias, also known as

Buyer’s Stockholm Syndrome, whereby someone who has purchased an expensive product or service overlooks any faults or defects in order to justify their purchase. As a case of choice-supportive bias, there is no exception.

Does this answer to your question in Q7 are real?

You know that I do.

Post-purchase rationalization is a cognitive bias, also known as

Buyer’s Stockholm Syndrome, whereby someone who has purchased an expensive product or service overlooks any faults or defects in order to justify their purchase. As a case of choice-supportive bias, there is no exception.

Does this answer to your question in Q7 are real?

You know that I do.

Post-purchase rationalization is a cognitive bias, also known as

Buyer’s Stockholm Syndrome, whereby someone who has purchased an expensive product or service overlooks any faults or defects in order to justify their purchase. As a case of choice-supportive bias, there is no exception.

Does this answer to your question in Q7 are real?

You know that I do.

Post-purchase rationalization is a cognitive bias, also known as

Buyer’s Stockholm Syndrome, whereby someone who has purchased an expensive product or service overlooks any faults or defects in order to justify their purchase. As a case of choice-supportive bias, there is no exception.

Does this answer to your question in Q7 are real?

You know that I do.

Post-purchase rationalization is a cognitive bias, also known as

Buyer’s Stockholm Syndrome, whereby someone who has purchased an expensive product or service overlooks any faults or defects in order to justify their purchase. As a case of choice-supportive bias, there is no exception.

Does this answer to your question in Q7 are real?

You know that I do.

Both are correct and the proof in both is on TCS for both. What is the difference between is because something is “negative” and something is “unused” but is not being used at present? In a software system, an unused expression is a useless expression. You can go without saying either one. Is “useless” a better way of saying it.

Is there any reference that

supports

my definitions? Merriam-Webster com : good : of no use; not serving the purpose; having or being of

no use Unused Dictionary.

com : not used; not put to use

Merriam-Webster : not being used;

not put to use Merriam-Webster : not not being used.