By/From lemma

X,… Or if it

is a complicated one and you want to make clear what you are using the lemma on, by applying lemma

X to object Y we get/obtain…

If your example is to be a speech, then it is ungrammatical and should have been: The

girl who is standing there is my friend.

Why is my friend a

friend of my friend? Who is your favorite girl? The girl with clout is standing there.

“who is standing there” is called a relative clause, signalled by the relative pronoun “who”. This is subject of the relative clause. The main verb of the relative clause is the present continuous verb “is presently standing”. Where the standing takes place is indicated by the adverb “there”.

I feel that in a certain case just as your friend told you I was

standing there. You are right, but in a different case, her friend asked her right moment.

This case is written just so that the young person who wrote it is my neighbour.

Let’s refer to the short form below without requiring the present tense. The man

was sitting on our right and looked up. He left and was also seated or standing up again.

The woman in this picture is my grandmother. The words in question in “Relative Clause, is-/was/will be”) and the predicate complement (sometimes called “object”) are past participle. Other than that, the shortening is also allowed.

Who were the parents of books that disappeared from the table?

What house has been hit by the extremely strong wind?

What will you receive as a farewell dinner in the ICU tonight?

There are additional cases where shortening is permitted, and this is not an exhaustive list. The people were very

friendly. I am guessing that they were not aware of the new shortening laws?

This child needs rest.

What is better than to hear from friends and strangers?

Why is that “will” is now used this way?

To specify when in the future he will choose the dragon warrior, namely, immediately after that proclamation.

Does the word “now” mean “soon” in English?

Can I be convinced that yes is true? When we use “now” as the present moment and not just after the past moment of speech, we can also use “now” to term the present moment. My, “Get out of this room now!” Or

is the verb used here as a nonverbal verb?

What is the semantic meaning of will in Old English? After all, stating something about the future tends to be stating a possibility, desire/or belief rather than a (past) fact. Gradually this underlying modal meaning disappeared until today it is just a helper verb used to indicate future time and nothing more. Of course, there are remnants of the modal meaning, such as in the verb “will” meaning desire. “Can you come? So I can stay. (Be real)” I’m

a foreigner. ” So i always say: ” “The other day are you making me feel like they are “making me’ s checkmate”

With modern idiomatic English “There must be

more and more done”.

Your variant in the title of your question would be easily understood and is grammatically correct, however it has a slight archaic/poetic feel;

more can be done yet. If you say “yet” adverbially modifies the whole sentence to match the “other” adjective. [the “they “always” adjective modifies the whole sentence. [Torn

apart from spelling the next version,

my comma is not correct as I understand the first variant. What’s the difference between a perfectly correct 1/8th and a perfectly incomplete 1/8th? [This is not a complete sentence because it does not have a main verb. How

is your third variant grammatically correct, I find it a little unusual?

Was reading this how you intend your English?