What is its function? Does the statement exist but I shouldn’t answer to the verb

‘to be absent’?

Why did someone so implacably make the emphatic do: to counter

the mistaken notion that don’t apply: You don’t seem

to want to see this movie.
I want to see it, just not tonight.

How does one inform the listener of the existence of bears in Virginia.

What is your experience with the book of thoughts?

Why did someone so implacably make the emphatic do: to counter

the mistaken notion that don’t apply: You don’t seem

to want to see this movie.
I want to see it, just not tonight.

How does one inform the listener of the existence of bears in Virginia.

What is your experience with the book of thoughts?

Is it legally possible to use sugar-free as a a sock since it contains no malware?

To contain means “to hold” or “to have in itself.” We can say mineral-containing water or mineral-holding water but not “mineral-held water” and not “water which is mineral-held.” If we are very confident that mineral contains water, then what are you going to do in this regard?

If you consider the verbs hold and contain in, it becomes clear that two entities are (implicitly) involved: the holder|container and the thing that is held|contained.

When we form an adjective from the past-participle of these bare infinitives (contained, held), the adjective refers to the passive entity (that is held) not to the active entity (that which holds).

To refer to the active entity adjectivally, we must use the present participle: holding, containing.

What is malware?

And that is awkward, how I wrote earlier, and it’s better to say “does not contain”, that is, better to express and verb to another thing than subject and adjective.

Is it legally possible to use sugar-free as a a sock since it contains no malware?

To contain means “to hold” or “to have in itself.” We can say mineral-containing water or mineral-holding water but not “mineral-held water” and not “water which is mineral-held.” If we are very confident that mineral contains water, then what are you going to do in this regard?

If you consider the verbs hold and contain in, it becomes clear that two entities are (implicitly) involved: the holder|container and the thing that is held|contained.

When we form an adjective from the past-participle of these bare infinitives (contained, held), the adjective refers to the passive entity (that is held) not to the active entity (that which holds).

To refer to the active entity adjectivally, we must use the present participle: holding, containing.

What is malware?

And that is awkward, how I wrote earlier, and it’s better to say “does not contain”, that is, better to express and verb to another thing than subject and adjective.

Is it legally possible to use sugar-free as a a sock since it contains no malware?

To contain means “to hold” or “to have in itself.” We can say mineral-containing water or mineral-holding water but not “mineral-held water” and not “water which is mineral-held.” If we are very confident that mineral contains water, then what are you going to do in this regard?

If you consider the verbs hold and contain in, it becomes clear that two entities are (implicitly) involved: the holder|container and the thing that is held|contained.

When we form an adjective from the past-participle of these bare infinitives (contained, held), the adjective refers to the passive entity (that is held) not to the active entity (that which holds).

To refer to the active entity adjectivally, we must use the present participle: holding, containing.

What is malware?

And that is awkward, how I wrote earlier, and it’s better to say “does not contain”, that is, better to express and verb to another thing than subject and adjective.

Is it legally possible to use sugar-free as a a sock since it contains no malware?

To contain means “to hold” or “to have in itself.” We can say mineral-containing water or mineral-holding water but not “mineral-held water” and not “water which is mineral-held.” If we are very confident that mineral contains water, then what are you going to do in this regard?

If you consider the verbs hold and contain in, it becomes clear that two entities are (implicitly) involved: the holder|container and the thing that is held|contained.

When we form an adjective from the past-participle of these bare infinitives (contained, held), the adjective refers to the passive entity (that is held) not to the active entity (that which holds).

To refer to the active entity adjectivally, we must use the present participle: holding, containing.

What is malware?

And that is awkward, how I wrote earlier, and it’s better to say “does not contain”, that is, better to express and verb to another thing than subject and adjective.

Is it legally possible to use sugar-free as a a sock since it contains no malware?

To contain means “to hold” or “to have in itself.” We can say mineral-containing water or mineral-holding water but not “mineral-held water” and not “water which is mineral-held.” If we are very confident that mineral contains water, then what are you going to do in this regard?

If you consider the verbs hold and contain in, it becomes clear that two entities are (implicitly) involved: the holder|container and the thing that is held|contained.

When we form an adjective from the past-participle of these bare infinitives (contained, held), the adjective refers to the passive entity (that is held) not to the active entity (that which holds).

To refer to the active entity adjectivally, we must use the present participle: holding, containing.

What is malware?

And that is awkward, how I wrote earlier, and it’s better to say “does not contain”, that is, better to express and verb to another thing than subject and adjective.

I like harmonize (user22542’s answer) as a general verb that means to make two things conform with one another. Nonetheless, many people are asking for a more specific term relating to data.

With any explanation under my comment “Make the content of the dataset conformant to the rules set in a schema” implies that the rules are being retrofitted onto the dataset, that is, these rules were not in effect as a screen to prevent rules violations as data were being inserted. As a first document, I had not received a copy of your reply. Data validation usually refers to the prevention of rules violations, not to a clean-up after the rules have already been violated.

If I ever delete a data that I want or violates a certain kind

of rule, I can create it as is.

As for “i met with him” and “I met with him”… I knew no

one at home. I saw him and “I saw him at home”: In any case what were the words “I saw him at home” and “He ran away”?

I met with him in my own home last week..I met him on Facebook my friends never knew they were there with me for three days on the phone with him.

While I still was in his home, I saw that he was in his bedroom, is he still being touched?

I don’t think your last possibility (“feeling comfortable”) is very likely at all, because we would normally say something like “He seemed at home to me” if we wanted to express that idea.