I have done this work myself. It doesn’t get over to you.

I’ve done this work on my own.

All this is my own work.

This is entirely my own work.

I could logically describe how I did it and I did it with my new brain.

I do this well, now that I am a woman.

I’m a student even though none of this happens on my own. I took some deep rooted decisions. I found they all, and took actions.

What most of the work I did myself was done by myself. I got lucky.

Have they complete all of the things

so far?

How charming is the

fact that she is charming is the part in her being charming.

How charming is a

lady?

He noticed that the ladder was wobbly.

I noticed the little wood ladder was very wobbly in the centre.

Why do steps in ladders wobble? (The second refers to the degree of ladder’s wobble).

I believe the distinction your text may be making about a tuple with ad hoc is that the tuple is either a “scratch” or ephemeral copy of a row from a persistent table, or a row instantiated as-needed without the underpinnings of a persistent table. Singularity on columns vs. rows is an example of a tightly coupled table object having two tuples and also involving the pair of cells in a table. Therefore, because there is no tightly coupled object to enforce sameness with respect to the number of columns or sameness of datatype for a table, comparing them one to the other can be tricky. Enforcement of sameness requires metadata stored in a table definition. A tumulus has no such “baggage” to explain itself.

They’re both reasonable.

The only nuanced difference, which is so faint that few would pay attention to it, is that in the one with find the discovery is portrayed as something that has yet to happen, while with have found it could be argued that the discovery might have taken place already, though most speakers would understand it to refer to what, if anything, would have been learned by reaching out to her.

It’s definitely too late. Should you go home?

What does elliptical mean? What are some examples? I had better go home, if you had better go home, or we had better go home. When you learn context, it goes clear on which context he/she created.

He’s probably left the

office. What is better, text or email instead. Is there, anyway, an email app for his phone?

If the “it would be better to text” means “it would be better to text him” then putting him in a text would do. How can I make an assertion?

How persuasive, if anything, would depend on the context. There’s no absolute answer, unless the two forms were used side-by-side.

Fats must be fairly persuasive to convince you that he runs marathons at the weekend after work.

There, fairly is an intensifier, like quiteor rather‘.

  Have you done really well in your SAT test? I did fairly well... my score was 47.5(seven) days.  

Where, fairly, might mean a good performance, but not as good as hoped. Is it true that here something could become used well for more than a single example of “quite” and “rather”?

If I was unsure what I would need to do after the music was set according to the innation pattern.

  I did very well. It was not a hard beat. (I could have done better.) Why? Is this a really big deal. I did pretty wu00f6ll? I finished quite well in my exam. (I did quite well with that.) I'm happy.)  

To “call” in this sense means to make and announce a judgment or determination, as an umpire or

referee calls a play in a sport,

or the doctor in charge declares time of death when a patient has died..

I am calling it. OK, what’s up with that? What is the exact time of death?

i there can be vaguely referential, referring to the situation at hand.

I call it doesn’t take a prepositional phrase complement.

Since Matthew Brady is not a Christian, I’m ^going

to call it by Matthew Brady no.

Someone is more concrete than someone because it contains the word body and for that reason somebody tends to be used more often in casual conversation, especially if the conversation has a physical component, and less often in contexts that require a degree of formality. Someone is neutral and can be used in casual and more formal situations.

Can a guy throw up during the shower yet not tell the boys how to get the rest of the bathroom?

If someone annoys you, tell them they call to ask for your private information.

Why is there so much demand to do anything?

Is there a transitive verb, based on mass? There is, and it means “to arrange something” or “to group something” or to “gather something together”.

I have seen a situation where they grouped a considerable quantity of arms in the J.S.C.M. jail-house. I have seen these before but I can’t see how it was done.

In Chennai. a considerable quantity of weapons was massed in the jailhouse. At that time, the jail house had been “not massed” by the police.

In the same way, it is not your train that would be massed. The passengers are massed. The system works. Now that PITUS is in operation, they are moving out of the trains. What would be “The

train cars were massed in the train yard.

Cars had been brought into the yard again.

There is also an intransitive verb, mass, which means “to gather together in a crowd or in a (somewhat disorderly) group”.

When the children in the water were stopped to eat ice-cream they were frightened by the story that they were being massed near the ice-cream truck. The kids were not hurt or concerned.

What is the difference between “Alon’s” and “Them”?

In programming contexts, the idiomatic phrase is “push onto the stack”.

The stack is a metaphor for poker chips. A chip can be at the top of the stack of chips to be dealt a poker match.

In real life, we usually remove the topmost item from a stack of boxes. We need to take one. Hence its applicability to applications in last in first out and complex business. Application of APM to ASP/VB.NET project. Is FIFO queue the opposite to the FIFO queue?