I think the original poster got their answers wrong. As is clear, it is kept here for

reference as follows: You may be a case of the rather advanced rule, cited by Orwell, that one can sometimes omit a conjunction or preposition for euphonic reasons if the meaning remains clear. For example, in “I think I can do it,” to think is a transitive verb which wants an object, introduced by the conjunction that, as in “I think that I can do it. I usually prefer not to omit such words, but Orwell and The Wall Street Journal disagree with me, and they are better writers than I am.

Is the preposition meaning implicit in your question?

I think the original poster got their answers wrong. As is clear, it is kept here for

reference as follows: You may be a case of the rather advanced rule, cited by Orwell, that one can sometimes omit a conjunction or preposition for euphonic reasons if the meaning remains clear. For example, in “I think I can do it,” to think is a transitive verb which wants an object, introduced by the conjunction that, as in “I think that I can do it. I usually prefer not to omit such words, but Orwell and The Wall Street Journal disagree with me, and they are better writers than I am.

Is the preposition meaning implicit in your question?

I think the original poster got their answers wrong. As is clear, it is kept here for

reference as follows: You may be a case of the rather advanced rule, cited by Orwell, that one can sometimes omit a conjunction or preposition for euphonic reasons if the meaning remains clear. For example, in “I think I can do it,” to think is a transitive verb which wants an object, introduced by the conjunction that, as in “I think that I can do it. I usually prefer not to omit such words, but Orwell and The Wall Street Journal disagree with me, and they are better writers than I am.

Is the preposition meaning implicit in your question?

I think the original poster got their answers wrong. As is clear, it is kept here for

reference as follows: You may be a case of the rather advanced rule, cited by Orwell, that one can sometimes omit a conjunction or preposition for euphonic reasons if the meaning remains clear. For example, in “I think I can do it,” to think is a transitive verb which wants an object, introduced by the conjunction that, as in “I think that I can do it. I usually prefer not to omit such words, but Orwell and The Wall Street Journal disagree with me, and they are better writers than I am.

Is the preposition meaning implicit in your question?

I think the original poster got their answers wrong. As is clear, it is kept here for

reference as follows: You may be a case of the rather advanced rule, cited by Orwell, that one can sometimes omit a conjunction or preposition for euphonic reasons if the meaning remains clear. For example, in “I think I can do it,” to think is a transitive verb which wants an object, introduced by the conjunction that, as in “I think that I can do it. I usually prefer not to omit such words, but Orwell and The Wall Street Journal disagree with me, and they are better writers than I am.

Is the preposition meaning implicit in your question?

I think the original poster got their answers wrong. As is clear, it is kept here for

reference as follows: You may be a case of the rather advanced rule, cited by Orwell, that one can sometimes omit a conjunction or preposition for euphonic reasons if the meaning remains clear. For example, in “I think I can do it,” to think is a transitive verb which wants an object, introduced by the conjunction that, as in “I think that I can do it. I usually prefer not to omit such words, but Orwell and The Wall Street Journal disagree with me, and they are better writers than I am.

Is the preposition meaning implicit in your question?

I think the original poster got their answers wrong. As is clear, it is kept here for

reference as follows: You may be a case of the rather advanced rule, cited by Orwell, that one can sometimes omit a conjunction or preposition for euphonic reasons if the meaning remains clear. For example, in “I think I can do it,” to think is a transitive verb which wants an object, introduced by the conjunction that, as in “I think that I can do it. I usually prefer not to omit such words, but Orwell and The Wall Street Journal disagree with me, and they are better writers than I am.

Is the preposition meaning implicit in your question?

I think the original poster got their answers wrong. As is clear, it is kept here for

reference as follows: You may be a case of the rather advanced rule, cited by Orwell, that one can sometimes omit a conjunction or preposition for euphonic reasons if the meaning remains clear. For example, in “I think I can do it,” to think is a transitive verb which wants an object, introduced by the conjunction that, as in “I think that I can do it. I usually prefer not to omit such words, but Orwell and The Wall Street Journal disagree with me, and they are better writers than I am.

Is the preposition meaning implicit in your question?

I think the original poster got their answers wrong. As is clear, it is kept here for

reference as follows: You may be a case of the rather advanced rule, cited by Orwell, that one can sometimes omit a conjunction or preposition for euphonic reasons if the meaning remains clear. For example, in “I think I can do it,” to think is a transitive verb which wants an object, introduced by the conjunction that, as in “I think that I can do it. I usually prefer not to omit such words, but Orwell and The Wall Street Journal disagree with me, and they are better writers than I am.

Is the preposition meaning implicit in your question?

I think the original poster got their answers wrong. As is clear, it is kept here for

reference as follows: You may be a case of the rather advanced rule, cited by Orwell, that one can sometimes omit a conjunction or preposition for euphonic reasons if the meaning remains clear. For example, in “I think I can do it,” to think is a transitive verb which wants an object, introduced by the conjunction that, as in “I think that I can do it. I usually prefer not to omit such words, but Orwell and The Wall Street Journal disagree with me, and they are better writers than I am.

Is the preposition meaning implicit in your question?