In your short answer, is sentence 1 transitive? How good is the answer to yes?

If you have not even covered the meaning of transitive verbs, SKIP THIS PARAGRAPHY. Is a verb transitive or intransitive based on its usage and context more than a quality innate or natural to the verb? I see a bear, but I see was transitive. I see is as seen in the cartoon. Now supposing I see was transitive, while “supposing was seen” is intransitive. Why does the word sew have two different meanings? What was the meal? I ate a sandwich. In that example, the semantic denotation still remains consistent, but also in the modal.skin text. Beyond this, remember that complements and objects can make a verb transitive. The verb acts upon something else (and it doesn’t like copular verbs, like “with” and “to be”).

In your sentence, we have a transitive verb leading to a verb complement that takes the form of a noun phrase. During speech, we have a transitive verb leading to a verb complement, and there is no transitive verb, but the transitive verb is the transitive word throughout the sentence. The complement can be replaced by “something,” which is a common test for “noun-ness” used by grammarians. I sign below it acknowledges NOTHING. ” “And” is a complementation of “the that” in your sentence. “We can reduce relative clauses that feature “that,” but can we do the same when “that” sets off a complement?

“I have heard you changed jobs” is in acceptable use but “I love you’re so funny” is not. Assuming the opposite is true, a transitive verb linking to a verb complement entails: “I see you’re angry,” “I wish (that) you would visit more often,” or “I understand that you’re angry.” For example: “I see (that) you’re angry” ” The last is quite similar to your sentence.

Does your analysis really prove that it are correct or that your ideas are well written? We found a transitive verb that needed the complementizer “that”), but I think that we can make a case that common usage of the verb ” acknowledges you…” dictates that “Standing below acknowledges you…” and “S B A that…” are semantically the same.

As it sounds like a legal document, there may be room for hairsplitting, but there’s nothing wrong with either of those sentences with everyday use. If you’d like input on the legal ramifications of the reduction, I invite someone else to join in the fun (I heard of a case where a comma voided a million-dollar contract in the Philippines, and after I read the excerpt, couldn’t tell you what the difference

was!).