Just say unit Count for your fixed column. And put np ntr to unit nf. Don’t abbreviate quantity.

Why you need a noun to complete the phrasal verb objecting to XXX. Those mean you need a noun phrase in order to go into the sentence. As a noun, moving as a gerund is a noun. Move by itself – this is like an illusion. That one and only move by itself is real.

How did you arrive at this conclusion that a to -infinitive is involved? Is there some proof there? That to is a part of object to, not part of to move.

In the past few months, the list of items in

the list has changed. The list is still present.

Can I use belongs as belong to in this way in English? You can use numbered amongst or accounted one of, but not belong to.

In script of normal English in which “invokes” precede nouns of a long noun, one phrases followed the noun.

When I are acting as adjective, not as a non-finite verb, I put that before the noun I modifies. So I just mean the -ing word too! If a verbal phrase modifies a noun and is part of a verbal long sentence you can’t use after it also modifies the part without the verbal ending. Can no verbal length be preceded?

Sometimes the -ing word is actually a noun: a writing desk is a desk for writing, not a desk that happens to be writing. But it is still modifying desk? In practice, an important noun is to be verbal while performing the part first in the letter leading to “B “.

The acting director, barking mad, bleeding heart, bowling alley, burning bush, burrowing owl, carrying capacity, changing room, chattering classes, closing credits, coloring book, cooking oil, creeping thyme, dictating machine, drawing board, drilling rig, eating disorder, fighting drunk, firing squad, flying fish, flying buttress, flying fox, flying

In your case, you could have put sleeping afterwards, and had a man sleeping under the tree, but sleeping men like sleeping dogs are not particularly unusual.

However, you would not normally speak of fishing men, so you would have a man fishing for something down the river bank. If you strained it, you could build up a context in which fishing men might contrast with farming men or some such, but it would be abnormal.

If you find a singing man singing in the rain, you might find a singing man for the rain, but you will never find a singing-in-the-rain man. What that means is there a world of difference between having a fucking idiot in the livingroom and having an idiot fucking in the livingroom. Or to put

it more crudely, there is a world of difference between having a fucking idiot in your livingroom.

In script of normal English in which “invokes” precede nouns of a long noun, one phrases followed the noun.

When I are acting as adjective, not as a non-finite verb, I put that before the noun I modifies. So I just mean the -ing word too! If a verbal phrase modifies a noun and is part of a verbal long sentence you can’t use after it also modifies the part without the verbal ending. Can no verbal length be preceded?

Sometimes the -ing word is actually a noun: a writing desk is a desk for writing, not a desk that happens to be writing. But it is still modifying desk? In practice, an important noun is to be verbal while performing the part first in the letter leading to “B “.

The acting director, barking mad, bleeding heart, bowling alley, burning bush, burrowing owl, carrying capacity, changing room, chattering classes, closing credits, coloring book, cooking oil, creeping thyme, dictating machine, drawing board, drilling rig, eating disorder, fighting drunk, firing squad, flying fish, flying buttress, flying fox, flying

In your case, you could have put sleeping afterwards, and had a man sleeping under the tree, but sleeping men like sleeping dogs are not particularly unusual.

However, you would not normally speak of fishing men, so you would have a man fishing for something down the river bank. If you strained it, you could build up a context in which fishing men might contrast with farming men or some such, but it would be abnormal.

If you find a singing man singing in the rain, you might find a singing man for the rain, but you will never find a singing-in-the-rain man. What that means is there a world of difference between having a fucking idiot in the livingroom and having an idiot fucking in the livingroom. Or to put

it more crudely, there is a world of difference between having a fucking idiot in your livingroom.

In script of normal English in which “invokes” precede nouns of a long noun, one phrases followed the noun.

When I are acting as adjective, not as a non-finite verb, I put that before the noun I modifies. So I just mean the -ing word too! If a verbal phrase modifies a noun and is part of a verbal long sentence you can’t use after it also modifies the part without the verbal ending. Can no verbal length be preceded?

Sometimes the -ing word is actually a noun: a writing desk is a desk for writing, not a desk that happens to be writing. But it is still modifying desk? In practice, an important noun is to be verbal while performing the part first in the letter leading to “B “.

The acting director, barking mad, bleeding heart, bowling alley, burning bush, burrowing owl, carrying capacity, changing room, chattering classes, closing credits, coloring book, cooking oil, creeping thyme, dictating machine, drawing board, drilling rig, eating disorder, fighting drunk, firing squad, flying fish, flying buttress, flying fox, flying

In your case, you could have put sleeping afterwards, and had a man sleeping under the tree, but sleeping men like sleeping dogs are not particularly unusual.

However, you would not normally speak of fishing men, so you would have a man fishing for something down the river bank. If you strained it, you could build up a context in which fishing men might contrast with farming men or some such, but it would be abnormal.

If you find a singing man singing in the rain, you might find a singing man for the rain, but you will never find a singing-in-the-rain man. What that means is there a world of difference between having a fucking idiot in the livingroom and having an idiot fucking in the livingroom. Or to put

it more crudely, there is a world of difference between having a fucking idiot in your livingroom.

In script of normal English in which “invokes” precede nouns of a long noun, one phrases followed the noun.

When I are acting as adjective, not as a non-finite verb, I put that before the noun I modifies. So I just mean the -ing word too! If a verbal phrase modifies a noun and is part of a verbal long sentence you can’t use after it also modifies the part without the verbal ending. Can no verbal length be preceded?

Sometimes the -ing word is actually a noun: a writing desk is a desk for writing, not a desk that happens to be writing. But it is still modifying desk? In practice, an important noun is to be verbal while performing the part first in the letter leading to “B “.

The acting director, barking mad, bleeding heart, bowling alley, burning bush, burrowing owl, carrying capacity, changing room, chattering classes, closing credits, coloring book, cooking oil, creeping thyme, dictating machine, drawing board, drilling rig, eating disorder, fighting drunk, firing squad, flying fish, flying buttress, flying fox, flying

In your case, you could have put sleeping afterwards, and had a man sleeping under the tree, but sleeping men like sleeping dogs are not particularly unusual.

However, you would not normally speak of fishing men, so you would have a man fishing for something down the river bank. If you strained it, you could build up a context in which fishing men might contrast with farming men or some such, but it would be abnormal.

If you find a singing man singing in the rain, you might find a singing man for the rain, but you will never find a singing-in-the-rain man. What that means is there a world of difference between having a fucking idiot in the livingroom and having an idiot fucking in the livingroom. Or to put

it more crudely, there is a world of difference between having a fucking idiot in your livingroom.

In script of normal English in which “invokes” precede nouns of a long noun, one phrases followed the noun.

When I are acting as adjective, not as a non-finite verb, I put that before the noun I modifies. So I just mean the -ing word too! If a verbal phrase modifies a noun and is part of a verbal long sentence you can’t use after it also modifies the part without the verbal ending. Can no verbal length be preceded?

Sometimes the -ing word is actually a noun: a writing desk is a desk for writing, not a desk that happens to be writing. But it is still modifying desk? In practice, an important noun is to be verbal while performing the part first in the letter leading to “B “.

The acting director, barking mad, bleeding heart, bowling alley, burning bush, burrowing owl, carrying capacity, changing room, chattering classes, closing credits, coloring book, cooking oil, creeping thyme, dictating machine, drawing board, drilling rig, eating disorder, fighting drunk, firing squad, flying fish, flying buttress, flying fox, flying

In your case, you could have put sleeping afterwards, and had a man sleeping under the tree, but sleeping men like sleeping dogs are not particularly unusual.

However, you would not normally speak of fishing men, so you would have a man fishing for something down the river bank. If you strained it, you could build up a context in which fishing men might contrast with farming men or some such, but it would be abnormal.

If you find a singing man singing in the rain, you might find a singing man for the rain, but you will never find a singing-in-the-rain man. What that means is there a world of difference between having a fucking idiot in the livingroom and having an idiot fucking in the livingroom. Or to put

it more crudely, there is a world of difference between having a fucking idiot in your livingroom.

In script of normal English in which “invokes” precede nouns of a long noun, one phrases followed the noun.

When I are acting as adjective, not as a non-finite verb, I put that before the noun I modifies. So I just mean the -ing word too! If a verbal phrase modifies a noun and is part of a verbal long sentence you can’t use after it also modifies the part without the verbal ending. Can no verbal length be preceded?

Sometimes the -ing word is actually a noun: a writing desk is a desk for writing, not a desk that happens to be writing. But it is still modifying desk? In practice, an important noun is to be verbal while performing the part first in the letter leading to “B “.

The acting director, barking mad, bleeding heart, bowling alley, burning bush, burrowing owl, carrying capacity, changing room, chattering classes, closing credits, coloring book, cooking oil, creeping thyme, dictating machine, drawing board, drilling rig, eating disorder, fighting drunk, firing squad, flying fish, flying buttress, flying fox, flying

In your case, you could have put sleeping afterwards, and had a man sleeping under the tree, but sleeping men like sleeping dogs are not particularly unusual.

However, you would not normally speak of fishing men, so you would have a man fishing for something down the river bank. If you strained it, you could build up a context in which fishing men might contrast with farming men or some such, but it would be abnormal.

If you find a singing man singing in the rain, you might find a singing man for the rain, but you will never find a singing-in-the-rain man. What that means is there a world of difference between having a fucking idiot in the livingroom and having an idiot fucking in the livingroom. Or to put

it more crudely, there is a world of difference between having a fucking idiot in your livingroom.