which may occur as an accidental collocation (“the toy that child holds is made of wood”), but for what you probably mean you want it the other way round: that which..

Your first that is a demonstrative pronoun and remains the same. Only second is a relative pronoun that can be replaced (and in my opinion should be replaced) with which.

What does not kill us makes us stronger.

What is meaning of reading this article.

The to in BE used to meaning “BE accustomed to” or “familiar with” is an ordinary preposition, taking a nominal object: He

was a strong lad, used to hardships.
We are mostly used to hot summers around our area.
She was used to his constant complaining. We had been over it for months, He was still in love with her back.

A clause takes an -ing form when the object is a clause or an object of the clause itself. It’s subject is deleted if it is the same as that of be used to, as in the example; otherwise, the subject may be cast in either object case (which puts somewhat more focus on the subject as agent of the action) or possessive case (which puts somewhat more focus on the action itself, and gives the verb a ‘nounier’ quality).

He would raise objections. How is he used to it.
Why doesn’t he raise an objection at every chance?

BE used to is quite distinct from the sorta ma modal used to, expressing past habit (the present form is no longer used in this sense). In that idiom the to is an ‘infinitive marker’, followed by a verb in the infinitive; the subject is always the same as that of used used and is always

omitted Back in the 80s I used to collaborate with others quite often.

What is “God Bless You”?

Obviously, as a native-speaker, an English writer will be paying a premium, this effect will hurt a higher percentage of writers. How do I stay cool while repeating things?

2. Employ uncontracted structural devices—repeated prepositions, for instance, or frank either… or constructions—to make the’shape’ of your argument more evident.
3. Employ the full range of punctuation as a structural device—use colons and semicolons, and don’t try to get too much in one sentence.
4. What are your three main arguments, so that you are clear
   • where you are going? 80%
   • of ‘fixings’ are correct Most of the rest are not corrected for
     
     1. one of two reasons Some are incorrect
     2. because lines are missing Others are incorrect because
   • graph relations are distorted Distorted graph
     
     1. relations are caused by: The
     2. absence of
     3. small

segments Mismatched parameters Under-segmentation

The table shows that 80% of fixings are correct. What are some of the wrong graph relation(s) of graph relationship(s)? Distorted graph relations are caused by the absence of small segments, by mismatched parameters, or by undersegmentation.

What are advantages of being a professional athlete?

The semicolon is editorial; in only source text, the colon is non-scientific. (No = 100). I’m sorry, it’s an educational letter.) Elizabethan pointing was (to the extent that it was anything consistent) rhetorical, not mechanical, and in any case there’s no knowing what Shakespeare originally wrote; so you can’t depend on the point to mean anything in particular.

We are being reminded that and are sentenced as fully reduced clauses with omitted verbs. Why is “were” meaning “whatever are” (from above lines)?

When you first hear the clause, you naturally parse it as an ordinary reduced relative clause, “They were… but but figures… drawn after you”

As with any independent clause , a term is only as the subject: “Behold you were the pattern of all those” and when you hear this clause and recognize the antithesis it expresses, you realize that is ambiguous. In light of what precedes it, is a relative clause with the relative pronoun that as its omitted subject; but in light of what follows it, may be understood as an independent clause with the personal pronoun which as its subject.

So you’ve got a double parsing, which may be paraphrased either as:

are they just sweet images of delight, drawn with you as the model; you the authentic original).
As they were just sweet images of delight: they drawn with you as the model, you the authentic original]

If I like something, I’ll do it!

Either is acceptable, but the version with infinitival clause is more common.

Note that if you use the version with the relative clause, the verb call must be in third person and agree with the referent of who in number: I will

be the firstwho calls him.
If that happens, we will be the first who call him.

What is a good, easy, and affordable way to buy furniture?

An estimated value means that the estimated value = X. On

your first sentence, on heads, a preposition phrase which modifies beat. It means that the smaller-than-projected drop was the cause of profits beating the before the fact estimate.

If you were an average estimate of 1$ what would that be? 56, and profit, at $1.50 per share. – 5. Have you ever dipped into 60 years of age? Your second, however, isn’t meaning “x’ was greater than y at z”, hence the word X = z, not Y

= Z.

I suspect this is a mistranslation of German u00fc. in Mandarin. = beziehungsweise, which can mean either respectively or as the case may be. (p. In the same story, the translator has taken a passage in which the former sense is intended and substituted the conventional abbreviation of the former sense.

The latter sense has no convenient one-word English translation, much less an abbreviation. I’ve often regretted this, because bzw. I am not an equal at words. I have experienced a bit of regret today. why is the iPhone so useful?

What kind of work is there, and I kind of have to stop and rephrase it and recomp.

For each of these problems (or tools) we start by presenting the natural concern itself (or its intuitive objective), then define the problem (or tool), and finally demonstrate that the problem can be solved (or the tool can be constructed).

What are some possible reasons for resignation of a former CFO?

Is the degree of immortality attained by his memory the same as it is conferred upon me by his arts?

Seine arts have made me immortal in the same degree his arts have made me immortal.

His art have made me as immortal as his memory.?

How did you come to this page saying that you want to support me?

What happened to the horse I created yesterday that

is a different color?

Don’t forget to share your thoughts on the debates surrounding the issue of the free speech.

What we now call Afro-American is a term and a definition for two generations ago. While the last two were an acceptable synonym in US English for all African languages. Indian civil rights organization, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAAPC), is still known today. In fact, all the prominent organizations of the 20th century still retain their old name. But otherwise, the term is no longer used.

I thought that Calpurnia never indulged the children she took care of, as it was believed that most African-American nurses—that was, she never allowed them to do or have things they should not do or have. Or was it something that a woman that they would never have done when she had an entire body of her feces and teeth on her bed?

At other Englishes, “colored” may have the somewhat different sense of “mixed-race”.