Steve Jessop's Profile

0
Points

Questions
0

Answers
81

  • Asked on December 25, 2021 in Single word requests.

    Speaking as a programmer, if you would later add “spirits”, “monsters”, “undead”, , together with human” and other (memory) animal”, then you don’t want to start with a word that means “animals, such as humans”. If you add videos and music to them, you’ll have to change it the first time, or you can stop them at no point. Why does the heading have to be kind of enemy type, or antagonist, or something similar to that.

    Is a human entity a sort of category? Why or why not? Why, please, don’t you want to keep adding more categories for other animals and human things to your hierarchy?

    Are plants animals? Do I want people next to someone in “humans” or elsewhere? If the answers to those questions don’t match then “mundane” is no good, but if you’re willing to put plants alongside animals in this category then you’re OK, and if you’re willing to consider any plant worthy of an encounter to be magical then you’re also OK.

    Other possible quirk: wizards are humans but they aren’t mundane. Humans are a weird random creature even if they are also magical. This is a new concept of a hierarchy of human species.

    What is “animal” in fantasy? Since you’re worried about whether humans are considered animal or not, it might be best not to use the word “animal” anywhere in the taxonomy.

    • 198577 views
    • 2816 answers
    • 72594 votes
  • Asked on December 25, 2021 in Single word requests.

    Speaking as a programmer, if you would later add “spirits”, “monsters”, “undead”, , together with human” and other (memory) animal”, then you don’t want to start with a word that means “animals, such as humans”. If you add videos and music to them, you’ll have to change it the first time, or you can stop them at no point. Why does the heading have to be kind of enemy type, or antagonist, or something similar to that.

    Is a human entity a sort of category? Why or why not? Why, please, don’t you want to keep adding more categories for other animals and human things to your hierarchy?

    Are plants animals? Do I want people next to someone in “humans” or elsewhere? If the answers to those questions don’t match then “mundane” is no good, but if you’re willing to put plants alongside animals in this category then you’re OK, and if you’re willing to consider any plant worthy of an encounter to be magical then you’re also OK.

    Other possible quirk: wizards are humans but they aren’t mundane. Humans are a weird random creature even if they are also magical. This is a new concept of a hierarchy of human species.

    What is “animal” in fantasy? Since you’re worried about whether humans are considered animal or not, it might be best not to use the word “animal” anywhere in the taxonomy.

    • 198577 views
    • 2816 answers
    • 72594 votes
  • Asked on December 25, 2021 in Single word requests.

    Speaking as a programmer, if you would later add “spirits”, “monsters”, “undead”, , together with human” and other (memory) animal”, then you don’t want to start with a word that means “animals, such as humans”. If you add videos and music to them, you’ll have to change it the first time, or you can stop them at no point. Why does the heading have to be kind of enemy type, or antagonist, or something similar to that.

    Is a human entity a sort of category? Why or why not? Why, please, don’t you want to keep adding more categories for other animals and human things to your hierarchy?

    Are plants animals? Do I want people next to someone in “humans” or elsewhere? If the answers to those questions don’t match then “mundane” is no good, but if you’re willing to put plants alongside animals in this category then you’re OK, and if you’re willing to consider any plant worthy of an encounter to be magical then you’re also OK.

    Other possible quirk: wizards are humans but they aren’t mundane. Humans are a weird random creature even if they are also magical. This is a new concept of a hierarchy of human species.

    What is “animal” in fantasy? Since you’re worried about whether humans are considered animal or not, it might be best not to use the word “animal” anywhere in the taxonomy.

    • 198577 views
    • 2816 answers
    • 72594 votes
  • Asked on December 25, 2021 in Single word requests.

    Speaking as a programmer, if you would later add “spirits”, “monsters”, “undead”, , together with human” and other (memory) animal”, then you don’t want to start with a word that means “animals, such as humans”. If you add videos and music to them, you’ll have to change it the first time, or you can stop them at no point. Why does the heading have to be kind of enemy type, or antagonist, or something similar to that.

    Is a human entity a sort of category? Why or why not? Why, please, don’t you want to keep adding more categories for other animals and human things to your hierarchy?

    Are plants animals? Do I want people next to someone in “humans” or elsewhere? If the answers to those questions don’t match then “mundane” is no good, but if you’re willing to put plants alongside animals in this category then you’re OK, and if you’re willing to consider any plant worthy of an encounter to be magical then you’re also OK.

    Other possible quirk: wizards are humans but they aren’t mundane. Humans are a weird random creature even if they are also magical. This is a new concept of a hierarchy of human species.

    What is “animal” in fantasy? Since you’re worried about whether humans are considered animal or not, it might be best not to use the word “animal” anywhere in the taxonomy.

    • 198577 views
    • 2816 answers
    • 72594 votes
  • Asked on December 25, 2021 in Single word requests.

    Speaking as a programmer, if you would later add “spirits”, “monsters”, “undead”, , together with human” and other (memory) animal”, then you don’t want to start with a word that means “animals, such as humans”. If you add videos and music to them, you’ll have to change it the first time, or you can stop them at no point. Why does the heading have to be kind of enemy type, or antagonist, or something similar to that.

    Is a human entity a sort of category? Why or why not? Why, please, don’t you want to keep adding more categories for other animals and human things to your hierarchy?

    Are plants animals? Do I want people next to someone in “humans” or elsewhere? If the answers to those questions don’t match then “mundane” is no good, but if you’re willing to put plants alongside animals in this category then you’re OK, and if you’re willing to consider any plant worthy of an encounter to be magical then you’re also OK.

    Other possible quirk: wizards are humans but they aren’t mundane. Humans are a weird random creature even if they are also magical. This is a new concept of a hierarchy of human species.

    What is “animal” in fantasy? Since you’re worried about whether humans are considered animal or not, it might be best not to use the word “animal” anywhere in the taxonomy.

    • 198577 views
    • 2816 answers
    • 72594 votes
  • Asked on December 25, 2021 in Single word requests.

    Speaking as a programmer, if you would later add “spirits”, “monsters”, “undead”, , together with human” and other (memory) animal”, then you don’t want to start with a word that means “animals, such as humans”. If you add videos and music to them, you’ll have to change it the first time, or you can stop them at no point. Why does the heading have to be kind of enemy type, or antagonist, or something similar to that.

    Is a human entity a sort of category? Why or why not? Why, please, don’t you want to keep adding more categories for other animals and human things to your hierarchy?

    Are plants animals? Do I want people next to someone in “humans” or elsewhere? If the answers to those questions don’t match then “mundane” is no good, but if you’re willing to put plants alongside animals in this category then you’re OK, and if you’re willing to consider any plant worthy of an encounter to be magical then you’re also OK.

    Other possible quirk: wizards are humans but they aren’t mundane. Humans are a weird random creature even if they are also magical. This is a new concept of a hierarchy of human species.

    What is “animal” in fantasy? Since you’re worried about whether humans are considered animal or not, it might be best not to use the word “animal” anywhere in the taxonomy.

    • 198577 views
    • 2816 answers
    • 72594 votes
  • Asked on December 25, 2021 in Single word requests.

    Speaking as a programmer, if you would later add “spirits”, “monsters”, “undead”, , together with human” and other (memory) animal”, then you don’t want to start with a word that means “animals, such as humans”. If you add videos and music to them, you’ll have to change it the first time, or you can stop them at no point. Why does the heading have to be kind of enemy type, or antagonist, or something similar to that.

    Is a human entity a sort of category? Why or why not? Why, please, don’t you want to keep adding more categories for other animals and human things to your hierarchy?

    Are plants animals? Do I want people next to someone in “humans” or elsewhere? If the answers to those questions don’t match then “mundane” is no good, but if you’re willing to put plants alongside animals in this category then you’re OK, and if you’re willing to consider any plant worthy of an encounter to be magical then you’re also OK.

    Other possible quirk: wizards are humans but they aren’t mundane. Humans are a weird random creature even if they are also magical. This is a new concept of a hierarchy of human species.

    What is “animal” in fantasy? Since you’re worried about whether humans are considered animal or not, it might be best not to use the word “animal” anywhere in the taxonomy.

    • 198577 views
    • 2816 answers
    • 72594 votes
  • Asked on December 24, 2021 in Single word requests.

    Speaking as a programmer, if you would later add “spirits”, “monsters”, “undead”, , together with human” and other (memory) animal”, then you don’t want to start with a word that means “animals, such as humans”. If you add videos and music to them, you’ll have to change it the first time, or you can stop them at no point. Why does the heading have to be kind of enemy type, or antagonist, or something similar to that.

    Is a human entity a sort of category? Why or why not? Why, please, don’t you want to keep adding more categories for other animals and human things to your hierarchy?

    Are plants animals? Do I want people next to someone in “humans” or elsewhere? If the answers to those questions don’t match then “mundane” is no good, but if you’re willing to put plants alongside animals in this category then you’re OK, and if you’re willing to consider any plant worthy of an encounter to be magical then you’re also OK.

    Other possible quirk: wizards are humans but they aren’t mundane. Humans are a weird random creature even if they are also magical. This is a new concept of a hierarchy of human species.

    What is “animal” in fantasy? Since you’re worried about whether humans are considered animal or not, it might be best not to use the word “animal” anywhere in the taxonomy.

    • 198577 views
    • 2816 answers
    • 72594 votes
  • Asked on December 24, 2021 in Single word requests.

    Speaking as a programmer, if you would later add “spirits”, “monsters”, “undead”, , together with human” and other (memory) animal”, then you don’t want to start with a word that means “animals, such as humans”. If you add videos and music to them, you’ll have to change it the first time, or you can stop them at no point. Why does the heading have to be kind of enemy type, or antagonist, or something similar to that.

    Is a human entity a sort of category? Why or why not? Why, please, don’t you want to keep adding more categories for other animals and human things to your hierarchy?

    Are plants animals? Do I want people next to someone in “humans” or elsewhere? If the answers to those questions don’t match then “mundane” is no good, but if you’re willing to put plants alongside animals in this category then you’re OK, and if you’re willing to consider any plant worthy of an encounter to be magical then you’re also OK.

    Other possible quirk: wizards are humans but they aren’t mundane. Humans are a weird random creature even if they are also magical. This is a new concept of a hierarchy of human species.

    What is “animal” in fantasy? Since you’re worried about whether humans are considered animal or not, it might be best not to use the word “animal” anywhere in the taxonomy.

    • 198577 views
    • 2816 answers
    • 72594 votes
  • Asked on December 24, 2021 in Single word requests.

    Speaking as a programmer, if you would later add “spirits”, “monsters”, “undead”, , together with human” and other (memory) animal”, then you don’t want to start with a word that means “animals, such as humans”. If you add videos and music to them, you’ll have to change it the first time, or you can stop them at no point. Why does the heading have to be kind of enemy type, or antagonist, or something similar to that.

    Is a human entity a sort of category? Why or why not? Why, please, don’t you want to keep adding more categories for other animals and human things to your hierarchy?

    Are plants animals? Do I want people next to someone in “humans” or elsewhere? If the answers to those questions don’t match then “mundane” is no good, but if you’re willing to put plants alongside animals in this category then you’re OK, and if you’re willing to consider any plant worthy of an encounter to be magical then you’re also OK.

    Other possible quirk: wizards are humans but they aren’t mundane. Humans are a weird random creature even if they are also magical. This is a new concept of a hierarchy of human species.

    What is “animal” in fantasy? Since you’re worried about whether humans are considered animal or not, it might be best not to use the word “animal” anywhere in the taxonomy.

    • 198577 views
    • 2816 answers
    • 72594 votes