Because these sentences are from different countries, their meanings differ from each other. This means that men are opposites, as one can see from their lenses.

In the first sentence, “it” is an actors or doers of some action. In the second, “it” is the recipient of the action. (Body Texts)

For example purposes, let “something” be “A gift-giving at a party” and “it” be a man (note that “it” is used for non-human beings, and is generally viewed as dehumanizing when applied to human beings).

After that, the

man has to give the man. After that, the man is the

giver of the gift. Suppose I chose two words before the man

said (he is a giver of the gift). What gift was the gift before the party?

The man is the receiver of the gift in two sentence. The gift did not come before the party, and had it after the party.

Both sentences are grammatically correct; based on the provided context that multiple buildings are being repaired, the second sentence is the correct choice to express that multiple buildings are to be repaired.

Do we really need a single building, named after three entities, to be repaired? What is the necessary repair work to be done on Alice, Bob, and Charlie’s Lecture Hall? ”

” The second sentence is expressing that multiple buildings are to be. repaired. I.e. one building, the other one building, etc. The final sentence identifies building, yard, etc. Both buildings are to be destroyed. “There will be repairs on the school, the hospital, and the supermarket.”