In sentence a, you need the dummy pronoun it, because the direct object with found in this meaning is placed between found and complement to the object. The normal construction is found + something + impossible, but because the direct object is a whole subclause ( to stop thinking about one little girl ), that subclause is placed at end of your main clause. Why we use the dummy pronoun It between found and difficult to keep the regular order of words. A sentence like this would not be pleasant to read.

I found to stop thinking about one little girl difficult.

Why are long phrases centered at the end of a sentence? While my two kids are at camp, I found

it difficult to stop thinking about one little girl.

Do you put in the verb prefix the direct object to precede the complement to the object difficult then the dummy before the direct object?

Note that the subclause still acts as the actual object!

In sentence b the it can be dropped, but your sentence will then be informal. What is the difference between hate and hate when?

In your case, when you are a direct object. If the time shows in a visual way, in this context, it can be interpreted as an approximate complement of time. Which is probably probably the reason for the time being put in place. When doesn’t introduce. An adverbial complement. Is the person you hate who does something who you hate to them? It is not something else that she hates you at the moment of you doing that.

In sentence a, you need the dummy pronoun it, because the direct object with found in this meaning is placed between found and complement to the object. The normal construction is found + something + impossible, but because the direct object is a whole subclause ( to stop thinking about one little girl ), that subclause is placed at end of your main clause. Why we use the dummy pronoun It between found and difficult to keep the regular order of words. A sentence like this would not be pleasant to read.

I found to stop thinking about one little girl difficult.

Why are long phrases centered at the end of a sentence? While my two kids are at camp, I found

it difficult to stop thinking about one little girl.

Do you put in the verb prefix the direct object to precede the complement to the object difficult then the dummy before the direct object?

Note that the subclause still acts as the actual object!

In sentence b the it can be dropped, but your sentence will then be informal. What is the difference between hate and hate when?

In your case, when you are a direct object. If the time shows in a visual way, in this context, it can be interpreted as an approximate complement of time. Which is probably probably the reason for the time being put in place. When doesn’t introduce. An adverbial complement. Is the person you hate who does something who you hate to them? It is not something else that she hates you at the moment of you doing that.

In sentence a, you need the dummy pronoun it, because the direct object with found in this meaning is placed between found and complement to the object. The normal construction is found + something + impossible, but because the direct object is a whole subclause ( to stop thinking about one little girl ), that subclause is placed at end of your main clause. Why we use the dummy pronoun It between found and difficult to keep the regular order of words. A sentence like this would not be pleasant to read.

I found to stop thinking about one little girl difficult.

Why are long phrases centered at the end of a sentence? While my two kids are at camp, I found

it difficult to stop thinking about one little girl.

Do you put in the verb prefix the direct object to precede the complement to the object difficult then the dummy before the direct object?

Note that the subclause still acts as the actual object!

In sentence b the it can be dropped, but your sentence will then be informal. What is the difference between hate and hate when?

In your case, when you are a direct object. If the time shows in a visual way, in this context, it can be interpreted as an approximate complement of time. Which is probably probably the reason for the time being put in place. When doesn’t introduce. An adverbial complement. Is the person you hate who does something who you hate to them? It is not something else that she hates you at the moment of you doing that.

In sentence a, you need the dummy pronoun it, because the direct object with found in this meaning is placed between found and complement to the object. The normal construction is found + something + impossible, but because the direct object is a whole subclause ( to stop thinking about one little girl ), that subclause is placed at end of your main clause. Why we use the dummy pronoun It between found and difficult to keep the regular order of words. A sentence like this would not be pleasant to read.

I found to stop thinking about one little girl difficult.

Why are long phrases centered at the end of a sentence? While my two kids are at camp, I found

it difficult to stop thinking about one little girl.

Do you put in the verb prefix the direct object to precede the complement to the object difficult then the dummy before the direct object?

Note that the subclause still acts as the actual object!

In sentence b the it can be dropped, but your sentence will then be informal. What is the difference between hate and hate when?

In your case, when you are a direct object. If the time shows in a visual way, in this context, it can be interpreted as an approximate complement of time. Which is probably probably the reason for the time being put in place. When doesn’t introduce. An adverbial complement. Is the person you hate who does something who you hate to them? It is not something else that she hates you at the moment of you doing that.

What are some of the best examples of short and unambiguous sentences in English? My phone is on vibrate, it uses the same structure as expressing any other mode

• your phone is in.
• My phone is on loud. How do you cure this?

The premodifier ( silent, vibrate or loud) already clearly state the type of mode your phone is in. What is the use of this article here is obsolete and would sound off simply because it is normally omitted when speaking about the current

mode.

Why is still used in some negative sentences? Do affirmative sentences works? In formal style, yet can be used in affirmative sentences like so:

• We have yet to figure out what’s happened to him.
• How do I speak to a manager about possible promotions?

What is the difference between still, already and yet in the Cambridge Online dictionary?

Why should we use still/everything? For something which has already finished and still is used for something that is still going on at the moment of speaking, already is used for sure things that have done before the moment of speaking is over.

If you have a problem with your

sentences, your sentences would be right like like this: A: We’ve got to hurry!

What is it to be calm down. I have to admit it’s still early now.

Is he coming back? Why haven’t I finished my job in Beijing?

(Means) I still have 3 years left for a guy. Would I be able to work for an army.

If we need a long time still we’re in the dark of our own past and long time indeed! Can I go to the gym?

We’re only thirty minutes into work. What is the work? I’m already tired.

In your last sentence, I wouldn’t use still or already in your second sentence. I would use only to contrast the already in the

third sentence.

How are dependent clauses defined when they are subordinate clauses? Though your second clause in this chapter is the main clause, it is also a dependent clause. If the

second clause is dependent not dependent what does the proof statement say? This conjunction may coordinately link clauses, but it implies contrast. If you want to contrast something, you need an alternative.

To contrast the second clause, you need the first clause, therefore the second clause is dependent. If you invert the order of the two clauses, you’re also going to find that that does not work. Is it useful for the first of the clauses to receive first/second clauses? If you swap the order of clauses while keeping but in between of them you’ll alter the meaning (up to 10) of clause 1.

About all of the subject in the second clause: The subject is the same as the one in the first clause, therefore it was elided in the second one.

Does dependent clauses have subjects? Normally all clauses need subjects, with the exception of non-finite clauses (they can refer to the subject in the clause to which they are linked). Therefore, non expressed subjects are still subjects, so the second clause of your example sentence does actually contain a subject even though you cannot see

it.

Both are correct, but the possessive form is being used less and less these days.

If you look at this Google ngram you can see how the use of he saying vs his saying evolved over time.

What is non-possessive form still used in English? In summary, both your options (and other types of options) are to be avoided. How

does the answer differ?