The word reveal should behave as a partial replacement for unfold. Possibly open as well.

What other attributes should I have for natural English? Yes, in the sense of the mind image being an image of revealing things not seen only on the outside. No, in that we don’t normally apply unfold to physical things such as mind images. They have done something so special in “Unfolding Mystery”.

All three responses are common. #1 is best grammatically though, using a future tense to describe a future event.

I’m aware that #1 is a very widespread native usage, especially spoken. I won’t be able to deny that I’ve been speaking so poorly of the first two phrases above. Is “Ann said” in past tense the speaker wants to continue with “was going”? What are these words for Ann saying that… she is going to do in February?

Can someone please describe a grammar that #1 and 3 uses well for this purpose? If the situation is that the trip initially planned but then cancelled (or if Ann planned it, then cancelled it) then #1 is okay. Because of the commonness of the bad usage I first mentioned, it may be ambiguous to listeners, though. What matters is Ann spout and the reason

• for decision. Ann had planned to go there with her boss but had cancelled after learning her daughter had a recital that week. She would have heard much more helpful. It was just my office talking about it. So how can it work?

Should I worry about my question or this question?

I don’t see any problems with the examples in #2 except it should say “to Mongolia” rather than “in Mongolia.”

An example pair tells the opposite of you.

If there is fire there is a real possibility you will become stranded.
What if anything happens to the house and people in it are forced to evacuate.

What is good in subjunctive mood? What are some subjunctives which can be a good thing? I am an English student at Leeds. They might even consider you wrong or even “backward”. The point is that modern English did not force the subjunctive with if but it did with should. I, not sure why this is the case, but it could be there’s a greater air of uncertainty with should, I think it is kind of your anticipation of the possibility along with the possibility itself.

When you want to move a word in a sentence, you should consider the effects.

1. Go to the store and buy some milk.
2. What is a good time to go to the milk store?
3. Should you go to the grocery store and buy milk?
4. If you can go to the supermarket buy milk.

A change from a command to a suggestion is necessary to make a conditional suggestion. The same happened for the command in the form of the conditional command. How did #4 the Should end up saying “OK?” As it was all about the previous two lines in the story. I’ve been watching #3’s OP. Thanks to everyone who has seen this. If in # 4 does not do that; it is just a dry, logical if, then

construct, to form a ‘then’.

Can you ask me how I can go through more than one option in the U.S law? At the end hopefully I’ll offer a counter susggestion. My comments will be welcomed.

How can I read all commands properly only to find whole extractions? Is there a command to run partial extraction on a computer? If not, just leave off the word altogether. Should I use this language? Since I don’t know the context, maybe it is necessary? I get how they put this out of place. I promise he won’t say anything about my place. Should it be significant, use quotes (“whole extraction”) or italics (whole extraction) to indicate to ignorant folks like me that whole is not being used in an informal speech manner, as in the whole shebang.

Is there a command or command in x? Commands are verbs. I can see whole extraction as being a command line option more than a command itself.

Note that I have inserted commas to divide the two primary clauses, each of which could stand on their own.

• The whole extraction command is optional, and if it wasn’t specified, no extraction is performed.
• The whole extract command is optional, and if it wasn’t supplied by the user, no extraction is performed.

Mismatched with the original “is” number in English Wikipedia. If you changed the “would be performed” part of the final clause of a document, you could get away with it though. What is the difference between a specified site and a service based on your application?

• The “whole extraction” command is optional, and if it hasn’t been specified, no extraction is performed.
• The “whole extraction” command is optional, and if it hasn’t been provided by the user, no extraction is performed. If something is wrong with this command, some extracts will die.

Whats the best? The “is” no longer conflicts with “if it has not been”.

If I break up a sentence? How do you use three clauses in a sentence? You are already talking about something technical, have you spoken about why? What are the barriers to understanding an object? This is the left extraction

• command, but the syntax is optional. What is the importance? When extraction isn’t specified, no extraction is performed.

In second person note that the 4 instances of is completely follow one another. What is your general operational guidance? The words ‘it is’ are optional; when absent, they would be understood.

)