I think bipartisan has more than enough political clout to meet the OP’s requirements.

Please note this is an American audience. Will the name “bicapartist” still be changed to “bicapartite”? When someone says bipartisan with “bipartisan” it means not consciously counting/enumerating all parties. If there was a new political option that enjoyed strong support between two political parties, would we say it has a third party? Would any English based and/or other minority/social class person, from a multi-party country

comment on their situation?

I think bipartisan has more than enough political clout to meet the OP’s requirements.

Please note this is an American audience. Will the name “bicapartist” still be changed to “bicapartite”? When someone says bipartisan with “bipartisan” it means not consciously counting/enumerating all parties. If there was a new political option that enjoyed strong support between two political parties, would we say it has a third party? Would any English based and/or other minority/social class person, from a multi-party country

comment on their situation?

I think bipartisan has more than enough political clout to meet the OP’s requirements.

Please note this is an American audience. Will the name “bicapartist” still be changed to “bicapartite”? When someone says bipartisan with “bipartisan” it means not consciously counting/enumerating all parties. If there was a new political option that enjoyed strong support between two political parties, would we say it has a third party? Would any English based and/or other minority/social class person, from a multi-party country

comment on their situation?

I think bipartisan has more than enough political clout to meet the OP’s requirements.

Please note this is an American audience. Will the name “bicapartist” still be changed to “bicapartite”? When someone says bipartisan with “bipartisan” it means not consciously counting/enumerating all parties. If there was a new political option that enjoyed strong support between two political parties, would we say it has a third party? Would any English based and/or other minority/social class person, from a multi-party country

comment on their situation?

I think bipartisan has more than enough political clout to meet the OP’s requirements.

Please note this is an American audience. Will the name “bicapartist” still be changed to “bicapartite”? When someone says bipartisan with “bipartisan” it means not consciously counting/enumerating all parties. If there was a new political option that enjoyed strong support between two political parties, would we say it has a third party? Would any English based and/or other minority/social class person, from a multi-party country

comment on their situation?

I think bipartisan has more than enough political clout to meet the OP’s requirements.

Please note this is an American audience. Will the name “bicapartist” still be changed to “bicapartite”? When someone says bipartisan with “bipartisan” it means not consciously counting/enumerating all parties. If there was a new political option that enjoyed strong support between two political parties, would we say it has a third party? Would any English based and/or other minority/social class person, from a multi-party country

comment on their situation?

I think bipartisan has more than enough political clout to meet the OP’s requirements.

Please note this is an American audience. Will the name “bicapartist” still be changed to “bicapartite”? When someone says bipartisan with “bipartisan” it means not consciously counting/enumerating all parties. If there was a new political option that enjoyed strong support between two political parties, would we say it has a third party? Would any English based and/or other minority/social class person, from a multi-party country

comment on their situation?

I think bipartisan has more than enough political clout to meet the OP’s requirements.

Please note this is an American audience. Will the name “bicapartist” still be changed to “bicapartite”? When someone says bipartisan with “bipartisan” it means not consciously counting/enumerating all parties. If there was a new political option that enjoyed strong support between two political parties, would we say it has a third party? Would any English based and/or other minority/social class person, from a multi-party country

comment on their situation?

I think bipartisan has more than enough political clout to meet the OP’s requirements.

Please note this is an American audience. Will the name “bicapartist” still be changed to “bicapartite”? When someone says bipartisan with “bipartisan” it means not consciously counting/enumerating all parties. If there was a new political option that enjoyed strong support between two political parties, would we say it has a third party? Would any English based and/or other minority/social class person, from a multi-party country

comment on their situation?

I think bipartisan has more than enough political clout to meet the OP’s requirements.

Please note this is an American audience. Will the name “bicapartist” still be changed to “bicapartite”? When someone says bipartisan with “bipartisan” it means not consciously counting/enumerating all parties. If there was a new political option that enjoyed strong support between two political parties, would we say it has a third party? Would any English based and/or other minority/social class person, from a multi-party country

comment on their situation?