philshem's Profile

0
Points

Questions
0

Answers
19

  • Why is it easier to understand with less ambiguity? By using the word’much unambiguous’, the speaker or writer is saying that the sentence in question could never keep getting better. If the speaker doesn’t like to suggest that a review is ambiguous, consider a thank you in advance?

    Why are English speakers more polite than English speakers? LINK

    In actual usage “more unambiguous” shows up 10% more often as often as “less ambiguous” (warning: N-gram link ), and it’s pretty constant usage since 1950.

    Despite the absolute nature of unambiguous, common usage doesn’t strictly follow that definition. If a thing can be less ambiguous then another, then another thing can be more unambiguous than another.

    In case you are curious, more unambiguous is most commonly followed by ‘than’ and’more unambiguous than” is most often followed by ‘the’ ( link ).

    • 656772 views
    • 199 answers
    • 242318 votes
  • Why is it easier to understand with less ambiguity? By using the word’much unambiguous’, the speaker or writer is saying that the sentence in question could never keep getting better. If the speaker doesn’t like to suggest that a review is ambiguous, consider a thank you in advance?

    Why are English speakers more polite than English speakers? LINK

    In actual usage “more unambiguous” shows up 10% more often as often as “less ambiguous” (warning: N-gram link ), and it’s pretty constant usage since 1950.

    Despite the absolute nature of unambiguous, common usage doesn’t strictly follow that definition. If a thing can be less ambiguous then another, then another thing can be more unambiguous than another.

    In case you are curious, more unambiguous is most commonly followed by ‘than’ and’more unambiguous than” is most often followed by ‘the’ ( link ).

    • 656772 views
    • 199 answers
    • 242318 votes
  • Why is it easier to understand with less ambiguity? By using the word’much unambiguous’, the speaker or writer is saying that the sentence in question could never keep getting better. If the speaker doesn’t like to suggest that a review is ambiguous, consider a thank you in advance?

    Why are English speakers more polite than English speakers? LINK

    In actual usage “more unambiguous” shows up 10% more often as often as “less ambiguous” (warning: N-gram link ), and it’s pretty constant usage since 1950.

    Despite the absolute nature of unambiguous, common usage doesn’t strictly follow that definition. If a thing can be less ambiguous then another, then another thing can be more unambiguous than another.

    In case you are curious, more unambiguous is most commonly followed by ‘than’ and’more unambiguous than” is most often followed by ‘the’ ( link ).

    • 656772 views
    • 199 answers
    • 242318 votes
  • Why is it easier to understand with less ambiguity? By using the word’much unambiguous’, the speaker or writer is saying that the sentence in question could never keep getting better. If the speaker doesn’t like to suggest that a review is ambiguous, consider a thank you in advance?

    Why are English speakers more polite than English speakers? LINK

    In actual usage “more unambiguous” shows up 10% more often as often as “less ambiguous” (warning: N-gram link ), and it’s pretty constant usage since 1950.

    Despite the absolute nature of unambiguous, common usage doesn’t strictly follow that definition. If a thing can be less ambiguous then another, then another thing can be more unambiguous than another.

    In case you are curious, more unambiguous is most commonly followed by ‘than’ and’more unambiguous than” is most often followed by ‘the’ ( link ).

    • 656772 views
    • 199 answers
    • 242318 votes
  • Why is it easier to understand with less ambiguity? By using the word’much unambiguous’, the speaker or writer is saying that the sentence in question could never keep getting better. If the speaker doesn’t like to suggest that a review is ambiguous, consider a thank you in advance?

    Why are English speakers more polite than English speakers? LINK

    In actual usage “more unambiguous” shows up 10% more often as often as “less ambiguous” (warning: N-gram link ), and it’s pretty constant usage since 1950.

    Despite the absolute nature of unambiguous, common usage doesn’t strictly follow that definition. If a thing can be less ambiguous then another, then another thing can be more unambiguous than another.

    In case you are curious, more unambiguous is most commonly followed by ‘than’ and’more unambiguous than” is most often followed by ‘the’ ( link ).

    • 656772 views
    • 199 answers
    • 242318 votes
  • Why is it easier to understand with less ambiguity? By using the word’much unambiguous’, the speaker or writer is saying that the sentence in question could never keep getting better. If the speaker doesn’t like to suggest that a review is ambiguous, consider a thank you in advance?

    Why are English speakers more polite than English speakers? LINK

    In actual usage “more unambiguous” shows up 10% more often as often as “less ambiguous” (warning: N-gram link ), and it’s pretty constant usage since 1950.

    Despite the absolute nature of unambiguous, common usage doesn’t strictly follow that definition. If a thing can be less ambiguous then another, then another thing can be more unambiguous than another.

    In case you are curious, more unambiguous is most commonly followed by ‘than’ and’more unambiguous than” is most often followed by ‘the’ ( link ).

    • 656772 views
    • 199 answers
    • 242318 votes
  • Why is it easier to understand with less ambiguity? By using the word’much unambiguous’, the speaker or writer is saying that the sentence in question could never keep getting better. If the speaker doesn’t like to suggest that a review is ambiguous, consider a thank you in advance?

    Why are English speakers more polite than English speakers? LINK

    In actual usage “more unambiguous” shows up 10% more often as often as “less ambiguous” (warning: N-gram link ), and it’s pretty constant usage since 1950.

    Despite the absolute nature of unambiguous, common usage doesn’t strictly follow that definition. If a thing can be less ambiguous then another, then another thing can be more unambiguous than another.

    In case you are curious, more unambiguous is most commonly followed by ‘than’ and’more unambiguous than” is most often followed by ‘the’ ( link ).

    • 656772 views
    • 199 answers
    • 242318 votes
  • Why is it easier to understand with less ambiguity? By using the word’much unambiguous’, the speaker or writer is saying that the sentence in question could never keep getting better. If the speaker doesn’t like to suggest that a review is ambiguous, consider a thank you in advance?

    Why are English speakers more polite than English speakers? LINK

    In actual usage “more unambiguous” shows up 10% more often as often as “less ambiguous” (warning: N-gram link ), and it’s pretty constant usage since 1950.

    Despite the absolute nature of unambiguous, common usage doesn’t strictly follow that definition. If a thing can be less ambiguous then another, then another thing can be more unambiguous than another.

    In case you are curious, more unambiguous is most commonly followed by ‘than’ and’more unambiguous than” is most often followed by ‘the’ ( link ).

    • 656772 views
    • 199 answers
    • 242318 votes
  • Why is it easier to understand with less ambiguity? By using the word’much unambiguous’, the speaker or writer is saying that the sentence in question could never keep getting better. If the speaker doesn’t like to suggest that a review is ambiguous, consider a thank you in advance?

    Why are English speakers more polite than English speakers? LINK

    In actual usage “more unambiguous” shows up 10% more often as often as “less ambiguous” (warning: N-gram link ), and it’s pretty constant usage since 1950.

    Despite the absolute nature of unambiguous, common usage doesn’t strictly follow that definition. If a thing can be less ambiguous then another, then another thing can be more unambiguous than another.

    In case you are curious, more unambiguous is most commonly followed by ‘than’ and’more unambiguous than” is most often followed by ‘the’ ( link ).

    • 656772 views
    • 199 answers
    • 242318 votes
  • Why is it easier to understand with less ambiguity? By using the word’much unambiguous’, the speaker or writer is saying that the sentence in question could never keep getting better. If the speaker doesn’t like to suggest that a review is ambiguous, consider a thank you in advance?

    Why are English speakers more polite than English speakers? LINK

    In actual usage “more unambiguous” shows up 10% more often as often as “less ambiguous” (warning: N-gram link ), and it’s pretty constant usage since 1950.

    Despite the absolute nature of unambiguous, common usage doesn’t strictly follow that definition. If a thing can be less ambiguous then another, then another thing can be more unambiguous than another.

    In case you are curious, more unambiguous is most commonly followed by ‘than’ and’more unambiguous than” is most often followed by ‘the’ ( link ).

    • 656772 views
    • 199 answers
    • 242318 votes