If you have this type of thing for an epigram or a sentence like “You are a” or “You are”

Should I

• talk like you’re a good friend?” ”
• You are invincible dude. You make a real cool DUDE. What do you like about your guy? “You’re
• a great guy, especially fathers. I really like you. How can I make my life better” You
• have amazing friends. ” “Okay, I have a real friend. Thanks for the encouragement. Thank you! What

is this important expression to good friend? I love you ‘I’ and you’. Firstly, inside the phrase “I love you”, there are different people and circumstances – maybe the sentence is very personal to you, but it’s clear from the context to you, because ‘I’ as well as you’. If the sentence is focusing only on one person, the sentence becomes somewhat more impersonal. While, without having the implied respect, the audience is not affected if the person is identified with the other person. Second, the “love” is the subject of the sentence, which means it’s also the part that gets the focus. If a person was a good friend of their friend, he is a great friend. They are friends but can’t commit to love. If they are ‘love’ then he needs a good friend.

How we deal with ‘love’ in some cultures? Areas of Britain) it would be considered strange or awkward. If we like people, how do we use “love” to people?

Can an audience listen to a song where both tone sounds similar but according to your choice, the tone of the piece would change. Could implies that the item in question is a possibility, whereas can implies that it is a specific item. Personally I would choose can as it seems that you are writing to convince or to provide bias evidence as opposed to an unbiased view/balanced argument).

As for additional changes, I suggest that you change (in this case) to proven, remove redundancies such as the ‘in this case’ after ‘therefore’ and change the ordering slightly.

It is a completely butchered version that demonstrates how word order and choice of words can drastically affect the tone of a piece of writing:

“Therefore, it can be proven that the use of computers does not negatively affect reading speed, regardless of whether the context is academic or day to day reading. “What

do you think “?

Often times the state is in this situation and can provide a “Stand-in” for the job. “Stand-in” applies because the person is a temporary measure and therefore they are not the ideal person for the job.