This kind of sentence represents a gray area. How does this kind of sentence work? Your both your examples are likely to be accepted by some native speakers but not accepted by some others. Is there anywhere for research?

At first glance, reading a sentence is slow. But then at last in reality, it seems that you change the sentence. If you want to write clearly, you should avoid this gray area of acceptable. I understand your point that the second version (with “of) might be slightly better than the first version (with “who”) but it’s still not clear enough for general use.

What are some ways to refactor a sentence?

Is it a best practice to apply skin cream after doctor prescribing it?

How do they express their feelings towards someone and why?

This kind of sentence represents a gray area. How does this kind of sentence work? Your both your examples are likely to be accepted by some native speakers but not accepted by some others. Is there anywhere for research?

At first glance, reading a sentence is slow. But then at last in reality, it seems that you change the sentence. If you want to write clearly, you should avoid this gray area of acceptable. I understand your point that the second version (with “of) might be slightly better than the first version (with “who”) but it’s still not clear enough for general use.

What are some ways to refactor a sentence?

Is it a best practice to apply skin cream after doctor prescribing it?

How do they express their feelings towards someone and why?

This kind of sentence represents a gray area. How does this kind of sentence work? Your both your examples are likely to be accepted by some native speakers but not accepted by some others. Is there anywhere for research?

At first glance, reading a sentence is slow. But then at last in reality, it seems that you change the sentence. If you want to write clearly, you should avoid this gray area of acceptable. I understand your point that the second version (with “of) might be slightly better than the first version (with “who”) but it’s still not clear enough for general use.

What are some ways to refactor a sentence?

Is it a best practice to apply skin cream after doctor prescribing it?

How do they express their feelings towards someone and why?

This kind of sentence represents a gray area. How does this kind of sentence work? Your both your examples are likely to be accepted by some native speakers but not accepted by some others. Is there anywhere for research?

At first glance, reading a sentence is slow. But then at last in reality, it seems that you change the sentence. If you want to write clearly, you should avoid this gray area of acceptable. I understand your point that the second version (with “of) might be slightly better than the first version (with “who”) but it’s still not clear enough for general use.

What are some ways to refactor a sentence?

Is it a best practice to apply skin cream after doctor prescribing it?

How do they express their feelings towards someone and why?

This kind of sentence represents a gray area. How does this kind of sentence work? Your both your examples are likely to be accepted by some native speakers but not accepted by some others. Is there anywhere for research?

At first glance, reading a sentence is slow. But then at last in reality, it seems that you change the sentence. If you want to write clearly, you should avoid this gray area of acceptable. I understand your point that the second version (with “of) might be slightly better than the first version (with “who”) but it’s still not clear enough for general use.

What are some ways to refactor a sentence?

Is it a best practice to apply skin cream after doctor prescribing it?

How do they express their feelings towards someone and why?

This kind of sentence represents a gray area. How does this kind of sentence work? Your both your examples are likely to be accepted by some native speakers but not accepted by some others. Is there anywhere for research?

At first glance, reading a sentence is slow. But then at last in reality, it seems that you change the sentence. If you want to write clearly, you should avoid this gray area of acceptable. I understand your point that the second version (with “of) might be slightly better than the first version (with “who”) but it’s still not clear enough for general use.

What are some ways to refactor a sentence?

Is it a best practice to apply skin cream after doctor prescribing it?

How do they express their feelings towards someone and why?

This kind of sentence represents a gray area. How does this kind of sentence work? Your both your examples are likely to be accepted by some native speakers but not accepted by some others. Is there anywhere for research?

At first glance, reading a sentence is slow. But then at last in reality, it seems that you change the sentence. If you want to write clearly, you should avoid this gray area of acceptable. I understand your point that the second version (with “of) might be slightly better than the first version (with “who”) but it’s still not clear enough for general use.

What are some ways to refactor a sentence?

Is it a best practice to apply skin cream after doctor prescribing it?

How do they express their feelings towards someone and why?

This kind of sentence represents a gray area. How does this kind of sentence work? Your both your examples are likely to be accepted by some native speakers but not accepted by some others. Is there anywhere for research?

At first glance, reading a sentence is slow. But then at last in reality, it seems that you change the sentence. If you want to write clearly, you should avoid this gray area of acceptable. I understand your point that the second version (with “of) might be slightly better than the first version (with “who”) but it’s still not clear enough for general use.

What are some ways to refactor a sentence?

Is it a best practice to apply skin cream after doctor prescribing it?

How do they express their feelings towards someone and why?

This kind of sentence represents a gray area. How does this kind of sentence work? Your both your examples are likely to be accepted by some native speakers but not accepted by some others. Is there anywhere for research?

At first glance, reading a sentence is slow. But then at last in reality, it seems that you change the sentence. If you want to write clearly, you should avoid this gray area of acceptable. I understand your point that the second version (with “of) might be slightly better than the first version (with “who”) but it’s still not clear enough for general use.

What are some ways to refactor a sentence?

Is it a best practice to apply skin cream after doctor prescribing it?

How do they express their feelings towards someone and why?

This kind of sentence represents a gray area. How does this kind of sentence work? Your both your examples are likely to be accepted by some native speakers but not accepted by some others. Is there anywhere for research?

At first glance, reading a sentence is slow. But then at last in reality, it seems that you change the sentence. If you want to write clearly, you should avoid this gray area of acceptable. I understand your point that the second version (with “of) might be slightly better than the first version (with “who”) but it’s still not clear enough for general use.

What are some ways to refactor a sentence?

Is it a best practice to apply skin cream after doctor prescribing it?

How do they express their feelings towards someone and why?